Children of Lucifer
The Origins of Modern Religious Satanism. By Ruben Van Luijk
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8205909 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stephen W Angell (Earlham School of Religion, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 86 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 577-580 |
| Publication date | 2018-05-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of the American Academy of Religion (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-7189 • E-ISSN: 1477-4585 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/jaarel/lfx073 |
| OpenAlex | W2769778915 |
| Language | EN |
This is a thought-provoking treatment of a movement that has captured the attention of scholars and laypeople alike. Its chronological scope is wide, beginning with a chapter on “The Christian invention of Satanism” (actually, Van Luijk looks briefly at pre-Christian roots of the figure called Satan) up to the twenty-first century. He defines Satanism as “religiously motivated veneration of Satan” (not, e.g., admiration of Satan as one deity or supernatural force among many, but embracing a system of belief or ritual in which Satan has dominance). Van Luijk’s introduction makes a distinction that is fundamental for his analysis, one that he successfully carries out throughout this book: he distinguishes between “attribution” (that is, ascribing Satanism to others, often with completely or primarily fantasized descriptions) and “identification” with, or “appropriation” of Satanism. He contends that attribution precedes identification, a contention that he justifies through the whole of his analysis. The centrality of this distinction to his scholarly endeavor, and the rigor with which he employs it, is a major point of differentiation between Van Luijk’s work and the recent publication by Massimo Introvigne (Satanism: A Social History, Brill, 2016); the two massive books are otherwise similar in scope.
Appropriation · Art · Epistemology · Identification (biology) · Literature · Sociology · Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies · Infant Health and Development · Philosophy · Religious studies · Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |