Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Corporate social vs. developmental responsibility

Corporate citizenship in the restructuring of China’s pharmaceutical industry

Bibliographic Data

ID8238196
AuthorsWoojong Moon (0000-0003-3465-3328, Hanyang University)
Year2020
Volume24
Issue7
Pages887-903
Publication date2020-10-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCitizenship Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1362-1025 • E-ISSN: 1469-3593
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13621025.2020.1812954
OpenAlexW3082279909
LanguageEN
References cited21

This paper examines the changing dynamics of China’s pharmaceutical industry since the early 1980s, focusing on the interplay between its developmental and social utilities. Two groups of pharmaceutical companies – globally established multinational companies and local Chinese companies – are compared in particular respect to business strategies, differentiated markets, and social and developmental contributions. Both Chinese and multinational companies have been required to establish and advance multi-dimensional corporate citizenship by respecting legal and regulatory codes, business ethics, developmental functions, and, not least importantly, corporate social responsibility pertaining to the particular public nature of pharmaceutical products. At least in public propaganda, the pharmaceutical industry’s social function has been prioritized to its developmental utility. However, prevalent corporate opportunism, erratic administrative environments, as well as immediate developmental concerns have often coalesced to render the industry’s corporate social responsibility frequently ineffectual. In particular, the developmental utility of local Chinese companies has often served a convenient pretext for ignoring their social responsibility. This was particularly evident when the Chinese authority dealt with serious corporate scandals such as the toxic capsule scandal in 2012 and the GlaxoSmithKline bribery case in 2013

Biology · Business · China · Citizenship · Corporate governance · Corporate social responsibility · Pharmaceutical industry · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Restructuring · Biotechnology and Related Fields · Management and Organizational Studies · Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy · Accounting · Finance · Law

  • Life Itself

    Franklin, Sarah Franklin•Global Nature, Global Culture•2000

  • Corporations and Citizenship

    Open Access•A Crane, D Matten et al.•Corporations and Citizenship•2008

  • Corporations and Citizenship

    Greg Urban•Corporations and Citizenship•2014

  • Community-based approaches to social exclusion among rural-to-urban migrants in China

    Julian Chun‐chung Chow, Christine Lou•China Journal of Social Work•2015

  • Governmental Policy and Social Exclusion of Rural Migrants in Urban China

    Open Access•Li Ying, Ying Li et al.•Asian and Pacific migration journal•2010

  • The China model withering? Institutional roots of China’s local developmentalism

    Open Access•Fubing Su, Ran Tao•Urban Studies•2017

  • Towards an understanding of corporate citizenship and how to influence it

    Chris Marsden, Christopher T Marsden et al.•Citizenship Studies•1998

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae