Economic Benefactor or Risky Dependence? Ambivalence in China–Brazil Agribusiness Ties
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8239356 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Pedro Abelin (0000-0003-0404-8039, University of Maryland, College Park, corresponding author), Margaret M Pearson (0000-0003-4266-9450, University of Maryland, College Park) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Politics in Latin America (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1868-4890 • E-ISSN: 1866-802X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1866802x261434254 |
| OpenAlex | W7137972558 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 46 |
China's growing economic presence in developing countries raises important questions about the political impact of its activity in those countries, and its interaction with domestic politics. This issue is highly salient in Brazil, where trade ties with China have deepened considerably in recent years in tandem with rising anti-China sentiment on the political right. This study examines how Brazilian right-wing agribusiness elites reconcile the extraordinary economic benefits they have reaped from exports to China with their partisan and negative views towards China. Our analysis of thirty-eight long-form interviews with agribusiness-linked producers, legislators, business association representatives, and experts, plus a quantitative sentiment analysis, finds systematic tensions between pragmatic acceptance of economic benefits from agribusiness exports and deep concerns about reliance on China, which together create attitudinal ambivalence. These results contribute to theoretical development of the concept of “ambivalence,” extending it for the first time to the arena of comparative political economy
Agribusiness · Ambivalence · China · Developing country · Politics · Salient · Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development · Global trade, sustainability, and social impact · International Development and Aid
National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade
The ABC of Ambivalence
Dependency Theory After Fifty Years
Beef, Bible and Bullets
The Political Economy of Agricultural Policy in Brazil
A Serpente Fora Do Ovo
Do China’s Foreign Economic Ties Lead to Influence Abroad? New Evidence from Recent Events
The Ties that Bind
A força da Bancada do Boi
Relational ambivalence
Enlisting the Gatekeeper
The Ideology of Brazilian Parties and Presidents
Voter and Legislator Responses to Localized Trade Shocks from China in Brazil
Great Expectations
The Foreign Policy Consequences of Trade
Affective News
Presidentialization, Pluralization, and the Rollback of Itamaraty
Buying Influence? Assessing the Political Effects of China’s International Trade
Liberal Ideology and Foreign Opinion on China
Interdependence and power
The Impact of In-group Favoritism on Trade Preferences
Pro-Democratic, but Not Anti-Authoritarian? Understanding Ambivalent Attitudes Toward Regimes
The Political Economy of International Trade
The Politics of Agribusiness in Brazil
Are Americans Ambivalent Towards Racial Policies
The Brazilian Extreme-Right and China
Radical Right Populism and the Politics of Cruelty
Reassessing Hedging
Don’t Cry for me “Argenchina
Lexicon-Based Methods for Sentiment Analysis
A Battle for the Soul of This Nation
Soy, China's Food Security, and the Brazilian Supply
"They own our country!" voter reaction to anti-China rhetoric
O populismo reacionário no poder
Constituição E Desigualdade
Harvesting Influence
Dependent development in South America
Agri-bolsonarism
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |