Discutere lo spazio.Come le pratiche partecipative toscane dividono la controversia rispetto alla localizzazione di una moschea a Firenze
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8239595 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Julien O’miel (corresponding author), Julien O'Miel, Julien Talpin |
| Year | 2013 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 5-29 |
| Publication date | 2013-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | PARTECIPAZIONE E CONFLITTO (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1972-7623 • E-ISSN: 2035-6609 |
| Publisher | Franco Angeli (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3280/paco2013-003001 |
| OpenAlex | W2065106027 |
| Language | IT |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 22 |
While participatory democracy is often presented as a means for public authorities to channel conflict in setting up top-down deliberative initiatives, the study of a bottom-up participatory process offers a much complex picture, shedding a new light on the articulation between participation and conflict in the public sphere. The paper presents the results of an ethnographic study of a participatory process that took place in Florence in 2011-2012 at the request of the Muslim community of the city, using a disposition of the Regional law for participation. As a matter of fact, deliberation managed to bring down the tensions around the project of construction of a mosque that could have, as it happened in many other European cities, resulted in a harsh conflict over the symbolic appropriation of the territory. It worked so well that the absence of conflict resulted in very limited participation and discussion in the local public sphere, failing to create a shared legitimate output such as the localization of the future religious center. Despite such failure, the participatory process also fostered the empowerment of the Florentine Muslim community that witnessed the emergence of new leaders and a broader public recognition of its civic status in the city. This indirect outcome of the process could constitute a crucial resource for the future battles over the construction of the mosque. This study therefore confirms the need to study together the policy, the politics and the microfoundations of participatory democracy to understand fully its consequences. Only when all these elements are analyzed together can the effects of participation be adequately understood
Appropriation · Articulation (sociology · Citizen journalism · Deliberation · Democracy · Economics · Empowerment · Microfoundations · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public sphere · Sociology · Historical and Environmental Studies · Italian Social Issues and Migration · Urban Planning and Valuation · Law · Public Administration
Democratic Innovations
L'instrumentation participative de l'action publique
Deliberation, Participation and Democracy
La démocratie participative
Gestion de proximité et démocratie participative
Types of Deliberation
Elusive Togetherness
Un bilan des recherches sur la participation du public en démocratie
Democrazia, partecipazione e deliberazione. Introduzione
Survey Article
The Place of Self‐Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy
Mosque Conflicts in European Cities
Means, Motive, and Opportunity in Becoming Informed about Politics
Rhetoric and the Public Sphere
Ideology, Attitude Change, and Deliberation in Small Face-to-Face Groups
Considered Opinions
Tre problemi per la teoria del consumerismo politico
Penser les effets de la participation sur l'action publique à partir de ses impensés
Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises
Why are Mosques a Problem? Local Politics and Fear of Islam in Northern Italy
When the Forum Meets Interest Politics
Deliberative Impacts
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,36 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2016 (2) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |