The Writing of Archaeological Theory
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8248449 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Artur Ribeiro (0000-0001-5608-4336, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Pages | 187-200 |
| Publication date | 2025-12-19 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Ophiussa Revista do Centro de Arqueologia da Universidade de Lisboa (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2184-173X • E-ISSN: 2184-173X |
| Publisher | Ophiussa, Revista do Centro de Arqueologia da Universidade de Lisboa (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.51679/ophiussa.2025.168 |
| OpenAlex | W4417507553 |
| Language | EN |
Throughout the years there have been complaints that theory is written in a very complicated manner, relying on obscure terms and metaphors, leading the more practical archaeologists to the perception that theorists are privileged and pretentious. There is some truth to these complaints – archaeological theory could indeed be considerably simpler and more accessible. The aim of this paper is to explain what factors have influenced theorists to write in a complicated and impenetrable manner, pointing out how the social, economic, and cultural context of the twentieth century have influenced theory and its production
Archaeological theory · Culture theory · Perception · Archaeological Research and Protection · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
| Highly cited | No |
|---|