Mapping do-it-yourself science
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8248583 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Federico Ferretti (0000-0002-5446-6522, European Commission, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-1 |
| Publication date | 2019-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Life Sciences Society and Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2195-7819 • E-ISSN: 2195-7819 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1186/s40504-018-0090-1 |
| PMID | 30741364 |
| OpenAlex | W2921206632 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 22 |
| References cited | 65 |
The emergence of Do-It-Yourself (DIY) science movements is becoming a topic widely discussed in academia and policy, as well as by the general public and the media. While DIY approaches enjoy increasing diffusion even in official research, different social actors frequently talk about them in different ways and circumstances. Interaction and negotiation processes amongst actors (e.g. policy makers and DIY communities) define the premises upon which different conceptualisations of DIY science are deployed.In this paper we offer a framework for analysing the discourse on DIY science.Our study consists of a field research of three spaces active in DIY science premises, two dedicated events of the DIY community, and an auto-ethnography in the field of DIY biology.By relying on the theory of social worlds/arenas (SW/A), we collected data on how notions of DIY science are constructed by different social actors and how conceptual borders are built or are likely to shift, resulting in multiple possible SW/A mappings. We conclude that each and every conceptualisation of DIY science cannot stand independently from the situatedness of its multiple contexts, therefore making its usage in policy making and governance particularly complex
Big Data and Business Intelligence · Computer Science · Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing · Research Data Management Practices
Shared motivations, goals and values in the practice of personal science
DIY Entrepreneurship
Do-It-Yourself laboratories and attitude toward use
DIY Laboratories and business innovation ecosystems
The rise of do-it-yourself (DiY) laboratories
Leveraging inter-industry spillovers through DIY laboratories
The business model of Do-It-Yourself (DIY) laboratories – A triple-layered perspective
Can do-it-yourself laboratories open up the science, technology, and innovation research system to civil society
Do-it-yourself (DiY) science
Understanding rural Do-It-Yourself science through social learning in communities of practice
Unconventional settings and uses of human enhancement technologies
DIY Shoe Sewing in a Developed Economy
On-farm agricultural inputs and changing boundaries
From self-tracking to self-expertise
The co-production of biotechnology and democratization in community science labs
Extra-institutional science
Navigating biosafety concerns within Covid-19 do-it-yourself (DIY) science
Citizen science and Post-Normal Science’s extended peer community
A new ethos for science? Exploring emerging DIY science “qualities”
Conceptualizing the democratization of innovation through transitions theory
One button in my pocket instead of the smartphone
Expérimenter et rendre désirables les low tech
Notes from underground
Circular economy as an essentially contested concept
The future of citizen science
IX.—Essentially Contested Concepts
“Dioxins are the easiest topic to mention”
The DIY Movement in Art, Music and Publishing
Factors Affecting the Use and Outcomes of Interactive Science Exhibits in Community Settings
Transatlantic Divergences in Citizen Science Ethics—Comparative Analysis of the DIYbio Code of Ethics Drafts of 2011
Open Minds, Open Spaces
Shifting Gender in Electronic Music
Institutions for Civic Technoscience
DIYbio
Make Magazine and the Social Reproduction of DIY Science and Technology
Buzzwords and fuzzwords
Politicization of Science in the Public Sphere
Neoliberalism and the Production of Environmental Knowledge
Situational Analyses
Science, Policy, and Controversy in the Cholesterol Arena
| Unique citing works | 22 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3,14 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2025 (7) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 22 |