Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Mapping do-it-yourself science

Bibliographic Data

ID8248583
AuthorsFederico Ferretti (0000-0002-5446-6522, European Commission, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume15
Issue1
Pages1-1
Publication date2019-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLife Sciences Society and Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2195-7819 • E-ISSN: 2195-7819
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1186/s40504-018-0090-1
PMID30741364
OpenAlexW2921206632
LanguageEN
Citations received22
References cited65

The emergence of Do-It-Yourself (DIY) science movements is becoming a topic widely discussed in academia and policy, as well as by the general public and the media. While DIY approaches enjoy increasing diffusion even in official research, different social actors frequently talk about them in different ways and circumstances. Interaction and negotiation processes amongst actors (e.g. policy makers and DIY communities) define the premises upon which different conceptualisations of DIY science are deployed.In this paper we offer a framework for analysing the discourse on DIY science.Our study consists of a field research of three spaces active in DIY science premises, two dedicated events of the DIY community, and an auto-ethnography in the field of DIY biology.By relying on the theory of social worlds/arenas (SW/A), we collected data on how notions of DIY science are constructed by different social actors and how conceptual borders are built or are likely to shift, resulting in multiple possible SW/A mappings. We conclude that each and every conceptualisation of DIY science cannot stand independently from the situatedness of its multiple contexts, therefore making its usage in policy making and governance particularly complex

Big Data and Business Intelligence · Computer Science · Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing · Research Data Management Practices

  • Shared motivations, goals and values in the practice of personal science

    Open Access•Enric Senabre Hidalgo, Mad P Ball et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2022

  • DIY Entrepreneurship

    Open Access•W Rodgers, Badriya N Al Shammakhi et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2020

  • Do-It-Yourself laboratories and attitude toward use

    Open Access•Jeewhan Yoon, Nicholas Spyridon Vonortas et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2020

  • DIY Laboratories and business innovation ecosystems

    Open Access•Qiang Wu, Qile He•Technological Forecasting and…•2020

  • The rise of do-it-yourself (DiY) laboratories

    Open Access•Daniel Meissner, David Sarpong et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2021

  • Leveraging inter-industry spillovers through DIY laboratories

    Open Access•Peter Galvin, Nicholas Burton et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2020

  • The business model of Do-It-Yourself (DIY) laboratories – A triple-layered perspective

    Open Access•Weimu You, Weifeng Chen et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2020

  • Can do-it-yourself laboratories open up the science, technology, and innovation research system to civil society

    Open Access•Évelyne Lhoste, Evelyne F Lhoste•Technological Forecasting and…•2020

  • Do-it-yourself (DiY) science

    Open Access•David Sarpong, George Ofosu et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2020

  • Understanding rural Do-It-Yourself science through social learning in communities of practice

    Open Access•Nur Baiti Ingga Wulandhari, Nishikant Mishra et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2021

  • Unconventional settings and uses of human enhancement technologies

    Open Access•Rui Gaspar, Paul Rohde et al.•Human Behavior and Emerging…•2019

  • DIY Shoe Sewing in a Developed Economy

    Open Access•Lucie Sara Zavodna, Jan Zavodny Pospisil et al.•Fashion Practice•2024

  • On-farm agricultural inputs and changing boundaries

    Open Access•Frédéric Goulet•Journal of Rural Studies•2023

  • From self-tracking to self-expertise

    Open Access•Nils B Heyen•Public Understanding of Science•2020

  • The co-production of biotechnology and democratization in community science labs

    Open Access•Dan Santos•Science as Culture•2025

  • Extra-institutional science

    Open Access•Anna Verena Eireiner•BioSocieties•2025

  • Navigating biosafety concerns within Covid-19 do-it-yourself (DIY) science

    Open Access•Anna Wexler, Rebekah Choi et al.•BioSocieties•2024

  • Citizen science and Post-Normal Science’s extended peer community

    Open Access•Muki Haklay, Mordechai Haklay et al.•Futures•2023

  • A new ethos for science? Exploring emerging DIY science “qualities”

    Open Access•Federico Ferretti, Ângela Guimarães Pereira•Futures•2021

  • Conceptualizing the democratization of innovation through transitions theory

    Open Access•Dan Santos•Environmental Innovation and…•2023

  • One button in my pocket instead of the smartphone

    Open Access•Enric Senabre Hidalgo, Bastian Greshake Tzovaras•Methodological Innovations•2023

  • Expérimenter et rendre désirables les low tech

    Morgan Meyer•Réseaux•2022

  • Notes from underground

    Stephen Duncombe•Notes from underground•1997

  • Circular economy as an essentially contested concept

    Open Access•Jouni Korhonen, Cali Nuur et al.•Journal of Cleaner Production•2018

  • The future of citizen science

    Open Access•Greg Newman, Andrea Wiggins et al.•Frontiers in Ecology and the…•2012

  • IX.—Essentially Contested Concepts

    W B Gallie•Proceedings of the Aristotelian…•1956

  • “Dioxins are the easiest topic to mention”

    Open Access•Nina Blom Andersen•Public Understanding of Science•2016

  • The DIY Movement in Art, Music and Publishing

    Sarah Lowndes•DIY Movement in Art, Music and…•2016

  • Factors Affecting the Use and Outcomes of Interactive Science Exhibits in Community Settings

    Léonie J Rennie, Rosemary Evans et al.•Visitor Studies•2010

  • Transatlantic Divergences in Citizen Science Ethics—Comparative Analysis of the DIYbio Code of Ethics Drafts of 2011

    Open Access•Kathleen Eggleson•NanoEthics•2014

  • Open Minds, Open Spaces

    Open Access•Ossi Salin, Kaija Pesso•Space and Culture•2017

  • Shifting Gender in Electronic Music

    John Richards•Contemporary Music Review•2016

  • Institutions for Civic Technoscience

    Sara Wylie, Sara Ann Wylie et al.•The Information Society•2014

  • DIYbio

    Open Access•Ana Delgado•Futures•2013

  • Make Magazine and the Social Reproduction of DIY Science and Technology

    Josef Nguyen•Cultural Politics an International…•2016

  • Buzzwords and fuzzwords

    A Cornwall•Development in Practice•2007

  • Politicization of Science in the Public Sphere

    Open Access•Gordon Gauchat•American Sociological Review•2012

  • Neoliberalism and the Production of Environmental Knowledge

    Open Access•Rebecca Lave•Environment and Society•2012

  • Situational Analyses

    Open Access•Adele E Clarke•Symbolic Interaction•2003

  • Science, Policy, and Controversy in the Cholesterol Arena

    Open Access•Karin Garrety•Symbolic Interaction•1998

Unique citing works22
Citations per year3,14
Citation span2019 - 2025 (7)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 22

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae