Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Precaution, governance and the failure of medical implants

The ASR(TM) hip in the UK

Bibliographic Data

ID8248587
AuthorsM Wienroth (0000-0002-9722-3918, Northumbria University, corresponding author), Pamela Mccormack (0000-0002-0172-1753, Newcastle University), Pauline McCormack, Thomas J Joyce, TJ Joyce (0000-0002-8497-5790, Newcastle University)
Year2014
Volume10
Issue1
Pages19-19
Publication date2014-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLife Sciences Society and Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2195-7819 • E-ISSN: 2195-7819
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1186/s40504-014-0019-2
PMID26573983
OpenAlexW2150717895
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited39

Hip implants have provided life-changing treatment, reducing pain and improving the mobility and independence of patients. Success has encouraged manufacturers to innovate and amend designs, engendering patient hopes in these devices. However, failures of medical implants do occur. The failure rate of the Articular Surface Replacement metal-on-metal hip system, implanted almost 100,000 times world-wide, has re-opened debate about appropriate and timely implant governance. As commercial interests, patient hopes, and devices' governance converge in a socio-technical crisis, we analyse the responses of relevant governance stakeholders in the United Kingdom between 2007 and 2014. We argue that there has been a systemic failure of the governance system entrusted with the safety of patients fitted with medical implants. Commercial considerations of medical implants and the status quo of medical implant governance have been given priority over patient safety despite the availability of significant failure data in an example of uncertainty about what constitutes appropriate precautionary action

Business · Clinical governance · Corporate governance · Health care · Implant · Implant failure · Medical device · Operations management · Political science · Status quo · Engineering · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Law · Medicine · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Orthopedic Infections and Treatments · Finance · Surgery

  • Orthopaedic Implant

    Open Access•Manvi Aggarwal, Arti Thakkar et al.•ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and…•2024

  • Framing the failure of medical implants

    Open Access•Gregory Maniatopoulos, Clare Hopkins et al.•Health Expectations•2019

  • From embodiment to evidence

    Open Access•Pamela Mccormack•Health An Interdisciplinary…•2024

  • Political Machines

    Andrew Barry•Political Machines•2001

  • Civilization and madness

    Open Access•Sheila Jasanoff•Public Understanding of Science•1997

  • The Precautionary Principle in the Risk Management of Modern Biotechnology

    Open Access•Marko Ahteensuu•Science & Technology Studies•2004

  • Power, expertise and the limits of representative democracy

    Open Access•John Abraham, Rachel Ballinger•Journal of Community Genetics•2011

  • Differentiating Agency Independence

    Open Access•Levan Makhashvili, Paul Stephenson•Journal of Contemporary European…•2013

  • Introduction

    Open Access•Rebecca Lave, Philip Mirowski et al.•Social Studies of Science•2010

  • Agency growth between autonomy and accountability

    Madalina Busuioc, Deirdre Curtin et al.•Journal of European Public Policy•2011

  • The View From Here

    Mike Gasher•Journalism Studies•2007

  • European Experiments

    Alfred Nordmann•Osiris•2009

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,43
Citation span2019 - 2024 (6)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae