Who Pays for the “Social Cost” of Labor
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8249684 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rojhat B Avsar, Rojhat Avşar (0000-0001-6904-4800, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 1 |
| Pages | 57-63 |
| Publication date | 2015-12-31 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2371-1655 • E-ISSN: 2371-1655 |
| Publisher | Lifescience Global (PUBLISHER • CA) |
| DOI | 10.6000/2371-1655.2015.01.06 |
| OpenAlex | W2806887866 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 3 |
Although the minimum wage is one of the most commonly researched subjects, its treatment by economists has remained inadequate and led to misconceptions regarding its role in modern society. This philosophical piece offers a rebuttal to the conventional merit-based objection to the minimum wage and puts forward alternative lenses through which the moral appeal of the minimum wage should be (re-)evaluated. We argue that our evolutionary heritage can help us demystify the persistent popular support behind the minimum wage laws. In our framework, the minimum wage laws will be viewed as instrumental in meeting the "basic needs" of those who are offering productive contributions. The approach taken in this paper will supplement and modify old institutionalist framework and equip it with proper moral foundations
Appeal · Economics · Labour economics · Law and economics · Minimum wage · Political science · Positive economics · Rebuttal · Sociology · Wage · Economic and Social Issues · Economic Theory and Institutions · Political Economy and Marxism · Law
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |