Uno
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8250043 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Federica Formato (0000-0002-2528-7330, University of Brighton, corresponding author), Vittorio Tantucci (0000-0003-4108-6552, Lancaster University) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 51-73 |
| Publication date | 2020-05-06 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Language and Discrimination (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2397-2645 • E-ISSN: 2397-2637 |
| Publisher | Equinox Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1558/jld.40129 |
| OpenAlex | W2990340163 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 18 |
Generic masculines – masculine forms used for women – are employed in many languages, for example English (Mills 2008), French (Coady 2018), Spanish (Bengoechea 2011) and German (Motschenbacher 2016), providing accounts of how gender is made visible in the language through morphological, lexical and syntactic units. These accounts are also linked with how gender is seen in societies and culture, reproducing an imbalance between women and men. Specifically, language discrimination against women is based on the idea that speakers orient themselves towards androcentric language, recognising ‘men’ as a metonym for the group ‘human being’ (Alvanoudi 2014), causing a linguistic invisibility of women. Similarly, studies in Italian have also discussed the use of masculine forms to refer to, talk about and describe women (Cavagnoli 2013), or have shown how these are used in specialised (Nardone 2016, 2018) or media corpora (Formato 2014, 2016, 2019). This article investigates the use of a specific (and underexamined) generic masculine in Italian – namely, the indefinite pronoun uno.m.sg (in comparison with una.f.sg) labelled ‘impersonal masculine’ (Formato 2019:69) – in three subcorpora of the Perugia Corpus (TV, Web and Spoken; Spina 2014). Uno.m.sg is seen as constructing ‘extended intersubjectivity’, that is, the awareness of a general third party (3rdP) acting as the social bearer of the utterance (Tantucci 2013, 2016, 2017a). The results show that the masculine impersonal uno.m.sg is widely used in the three subcorpora and in several functions, confirming that grammatically gendered language is still employed within a ‘masculine as a norm’ order
German · Invisibility · Linguistics · Masculinity · Pronoun · Sociology · Utterance · Computer Science · Gender Studies · Gender Studies in Language · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity · Philosophy · Psychology
How to do Linguistics with R
Intersubjectification and clause periphery
Sex, Syntax, and Semantics
Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?
The origin of sexism in language
A discursive approach to structural gender linguistics
Toward a typology of constative speech acts
Grammatical gender as a challenge for language policy
Non-sexist Spanish policies
Double gender marking in French
Who stands for the norm? The place of metonymy in androcentric language
A corpus-based account of the development of English such and Dutch zulk
Masculine Bias in the Attribution of Personhood
Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar
Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions
Interpersonal evidentiality
An evolutionary approach to semasiological change
Illocutional concurrences
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |