Deconstructing men's rights activism
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8250053 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Giuseppina Scotto Di Carlo (0000-0003-3891-0635, University of Naples - L'Orientale, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 74-99 |
| Publication date | 2024-02-16 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Language and Discrimination (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2397-2645 • E-ISSN: 2397-2637 |
| Publisher | Equinox Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1558/jld.25747 |
| OpenAlex | W4391101709 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
This work examines the attitudes of men's rights activists (MRAs) towards Rape Culture (RC), a term describing a social environment in which sexual misconduct is trivialised, normalised, and justified. By performing a discourse and thematic analysis of a corpus of threads from MRA forums, the study aims to determine whether their representation of RC amounts to a form of collective D.A.R.V.O., a tactic used to delegitimise a phenomenon by denying its existence, attacking its advocates, and reversing the roles of victims and perpetrators. The analysis reveals that MRAs’ representation of RC arises from a reductionist definition of the term, which limits its interpretation to actual rapes and denies it as a socio-culturally ingrained phenomenon. This narrow definition hinders progress in addressing all forms of gender-based violence, harming men and women alike. The study concludes that a broader understanding of RC is necessary to combat its effects and improve gender relations
Criminology · Epistemology · MRAS · Phenomenon · Political science · Politics · Qualitative research · Reductionism · Social science · Sociology · Thematic analysis · Computer Science · Engineering · Gender Politics and Representation · Gender Studies · Gender, Security, and Conflict · Law · Psychology · Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies · Social Psychology
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |