Amicus Brief
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8252612 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alessandra Raengo (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 4-33 |
| Publication date | 2025-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | liquid blackness (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2692-3874 • E-ISSN: 2692-3874 |
| Publisher | Duke University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1215/26923874-11930733 |
| OpenAlex | W7131878379 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 17 |
This introduction is intended as an amicus brief against the enclosure that the doctrine of fair use cannot not constantly reproduce. Moving from the troubled and troubling role of aesthetic judgment in court decisions and vain appeals to common sense, this essay considers the role of the work of art criticism in reentrenching property rights at a time when it has become subsumed into an increasingly securitized art world
Criticism · Doctrine · Proposition · Real property · Archaeological Research and Protection · Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art · Law in Society and Culture
On the sleeve of the visual
Speculation as a Mode of Production
The Witch’s Flight
Boggs Bills
The Absent Prince
Trompe L'oeil and Financial Risk in the Age of Paper
The Breaks
Motion Practice (with Portrait of Jason )
Poetic Proliferations
A Blunt Instrument
A View of a Landscape and Other Church Problems
Appraising Summer of Sam
After Economy
The Case of Blackness
| Highly cited | No |
|---|