Tending the nurseries of democracy

In Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L. (2021), the Supreme Court held a public school could not discipline a student for posting offensive snaps about her cheer team on social media. In an 8-to-1 decision siding with the student, the Justices reaffirmed Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969), a landmark decision by the Warren Court that extended speech rights to public school students. The majority in Mahanoy was, however, unwilling to “set forth a broad, highly general First Amendment rule stating just what counts as ‘off-campus’ speech and whether First Amendment standards must give way off-campus to the school’s desire to prevent ... disruption of learning-related activities.” Instead, Justice Breyer offered a narrow opinion confined to the facts of the case that provides little practical guidance to students, school officials, and lower courts dealing with thorny issues related to off-campus speech. Further compounding matters, the “three features of off-campus speech” identified in his majority opinion will likely lead to more restrictions governing what students may say on their own time and using their own equipment

Democracy · Economic Justice · First amendment · Free speech · Majority opinion · Offensive · Pedagogy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · School district · Sociology · Supreme court · Tinker · Engineering · Law, Rights, and Freedoms · Legal Issues in Education · Law

• Cultivating democracy in the classroom

  Susan Balter-Reitz•Communication and Democracy•2024

  Add to list

• At stake in the rules of communication is democratic life itself

  Kevin A Johnson, Kevin Johnson•Communication and Democracy•2022

  Add to list

• Lessons in Censorship

  Catherine J Ro, Catherine J Ross•Lessons in Censorship•2015

  Add to list