Judicial discretion

Problematizing the ascertainment and application of customary law by formal courts and relevant theories (Nigeria and South Africa)

Bibliographic Data

ID8253269
AuthorsRebecca Emiene Badejogbin (0000-0002-9543-6565, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume54
Issue2-3
Pages252-277
Publication date2022-09-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueLegal Pluralism and Critical Social Analysis (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2770-6869 • E-ISSN: 2770-6877
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/27706869.2022.2119024
OpenAlexW4295931779
LanguageEN
References cited30

Conceptualizing legal education in Africa according to western legal thought and theories has been a major setback in the manner that indigenous African law has been theorized in legal scholarship. This affects how it has been interpreted and applied by courts in its exercise of judicial discretion which is a field that is yet to be adequately explored with respect to the application of indigenous law by courts in a pluralistic legal system. This paper presents, based on empirical data, a theoretical basis for the utilization of judicial discretion in the ascertainment and application of indigenous law by formal courts in Nigeria and South Africa and offers an analysis using relevant legal doctrines of centralism, realism and pluralism. At the core of the analysis is Hart’s extrapolation of the conception of law and the place of judicial discretion and how indigenous law fits into it despite its exclusion by Hart

Common law · Comparative law · Discretion · Indigenous · Judicial discretion · Judicial review · Legal pluralism · Legal realism · Political science · Sociology · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Legal Issues in South Africa

Tools

Open DOI