Alexander Hamilton’s Constitutional Jurisprudence and the Bank Bill
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8303310 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Peter Charles Hoffer (University of Georgia, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 64 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 27-44 |
| Publication date | 2024-06-24 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of Legal History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-9319 • E-ISSN: 2161-797X |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ajlh/njae002 |
| OpenAlex | W4392636937 |
| Language | EN |
Alexander Hamilton's view of law was more than pragmatic. Forward looking, and innovative, it saw law as a creative tool. Often misread, and dismissed, as mere policy preference, it was in fact sophisticated and superbly articulated jurisprudence. In the years between the ratification debate and the proposal for the First Bank of the United States, Hamilton displayed this jurisprudence to great effect
Economics · Jurisprudence · Political science · Politics · Preference · Ratification · Sociology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Legal and Constitutional Studies
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |