Associations between adult spectral tarsiers
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8312449 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sharon Gursky (0000-0001-5100-9759, Texas A&M University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2005 |
| Volume | 128 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 74-83 |
| Publication date | 2005-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of Physical Anthropology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-9483 • E-ISSN: 1096-8644 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/ajpa.20104 |
| PMID | 15761808 |
| OpenAlex | W2042305767 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 26 |
While anecdotal observations of gregarious behavior in nocturnal prosimian primates are common, most anthropologists continue to refer to them as solitary, perhaps based on the assumption that the occasional social interactions observed via ad libitum methods represent random chance encounters and not patterned social interactions. In this paper, I test the null hypothesis that nocturnal encounters between spectral tarsier ( Tarsius spectrum ) group members, outside of the sleeping tree, are the result of chance. Three male‐female pairs were radio‐collared and observed over a 4‐month period, using continuous focal animal sampling at the Tangkoko Nature Reserve (Sulawesi, Indonesia). Using Waser's random gas model, I found that spectral tarsiers spent more time in proximity to other group members than expected by chance, given the size of their home range and nightly path length. Adult group members spent 11% of the night in physical contact and an additional 17% of the night within a 10‐m radius of one another. Spectral tarsiers were also observed to significantly increase the amount of time spent foraging when located less than 10 m from another group member. Individuals foraging in proximity to another adult group member had lower insect capture rates compared to individuals who were not foraging in proximity to another adult group member. If living in a group is costly to these tarsiers' foraging efficiency, then why don't they actively avoid one another when foraging? One situation in which it might benefit tarsiers to be gregarious is high predation pressure. Preliminary results suggest that predation pressure by snakes may be the most likely factor selecting for the tarsiers to forage in proximity. Am J Phys Anthropol 128:74‐83, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc
Adult male · Biology · Foraging · Habitat · Home range · Lemur · Nocturnal · Predation · Primate · Prosimian · Zoology · Animal Behavior and Reproduction · Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior · Demography · Ecology · Primate Behavior and Ecology
Population density, mobility, and cultural transmission
Logistical mobility reduces subsistence risk in hunting economies
Social lives of adult mysore slender lorises ( Loris lydekkerianus lydekkerianus )
Defining the Low End of Primate Social Complexity
Ranging Behavior and Possible Correlates of Pair-Living in Southeastern Avahis (Madagascar)
Ranging Behavior of Philippine Tarsiers (Carlito syrichta) Inhabiting a Protected Forest Fragment in Misamis Oriental, Mindanao
Biology of Cheirogaleus major in a Littoral Rain Forest in Southeast Madagascar
Sleeping Site Selection, Sleep-related Positional Behavior, and Social System of Philippine Tarsiers (Carlito syrichta) Inhabiting a Protected Forest Fragment in Mindanao Island, Philippines
Fission-fusion and the evolution of hominin social systems
Costs of maternal care
Observational Study of Behavior
Primate Adaptation and Evolution
Aspects of social life in the fat-tailed dwarf lemur (Cheirogaleus medius)
Evolutionary Ecology and Human Behavior
Primate Social Systems
Social organization of Galagos in Kenyan coastal forests
The behavior of wild spectral tarsiers
Sociality in a nocturnal “solitary” prosimian
Effect of Seasonality on the Behavior of an Insectivorous Primate, Tarsius spectrum
Infant care in the spectral tarsier (Tarsius spectrum) Sulawesi, Indonesia
Biogeographical Evolution of the Malay Archipelago
Whither Primatology? The Place of Primates in Contemporary Anthropology
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,45 |
| Citation span | 2006 - 2025 (20) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |