Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Technical note

Performance of semi and fully automated approaches for registration of 3D surface coordinates in geometric morphometric studies

Bibliographic Data

ID8315426
AuthorsPaula González (0000-0003-0154-0087, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, corresponding author), Paula N Gonzalez (Universidad Nacional de La Plata), Jimena Barbeito-Andrés (0000-0001-9598-5874, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas), Jimena Barbeito‐Andrés (Universidad Nacional de La Plata), Lucas Andrés D'Addona (0000-0002-8649-4683, Universidad Nacional de La Plata), Bernal (0000-0001-5233-4035, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas), Valeria Bernal (División Antropología, Facultad De Ciencias Naturales Y Museo Universidad Nacional de La Plata La Plata 1900 Argentina), I Pérez (0000-0002-6543-5545, División Antropología, Facultad De Ciencias Naturales Y Museo Universidad Nacional de La Plata La Plata 1900 Argentina), S Ivan Perez
Year2016
Volume160
Issue1
Pages169-178
Publication date2016-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-9483 • E-ISSN: 1096-8644
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/ajpa.22934
PMID26748891
OpenAlexW2230284341
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited37

OBJECTIVES: One of the biggest challenges in the study of complex morphologies is to adequately describe shape variation. Here, we assess how the random sampling of surface points automatically obtained performs, when compared with observer-guided sampling procedures, and also evaluate the effect of sliding surface points by bending energy and minimum Procrustes distance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three datasets comprising structures with disparate levels of complexity and intrasample variation are as follows: mouse molars, mouse brains, and primate endocasts. Different configurations of 3D coordinates on curves and surfaces were digitized from MRI images and CT scans using semi and fully automated procedures. Shape variables were obtained by Generalized Procrustes Superpositions before and after sliding the pseudolandmarks. Multivariate analyses were used to summarize and compare shape variation. RESULTS: For the primate endocast, the semiautomated and automated strategies yield similar ordinations of specimens. Conversely, the semiautomated strategy better discriminates molar shapes between mouse groups. Shape differences among specimens are not adequately represented by the PCs calculated with surface pseudolandmarks. This is improved when the points are converted into semilandmarks by a sliding criterion. DISCUSSION: Surface semilandmarks automatically obtained from 3D models are promising although they should be used with some caution in complex structures. This approach can be taken as complementary of semiautomated procedures which perform better for assessing shape variation in localized traits previously selected while automated procedures are suitable in studies aimed at comparing overall variation in shape and when there is no previous information about highly variable anatomical regions

Algorithm · Biology · Computer vision · Endocast · Geometry · Multivariate statistics · Pattern recognition (psychology) · Statistics · Surface (topology) · Variation (astronomy) · Anatomy · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Mathematics · Medical Image Segmentation Techniques · Morphological variations and asymmetry · Point processes and geometric inequalities

  • Quantification of 3D curvature in the iliac crest

    Open Access•Laura A B Wilson, Rachel Ives et al.•American Journal of Physical…•2017

  • Comparing semi‐landmarking approaches for analyzing three‐dimensional cranial morphology

    Open Access•Sara Rolfe, Christopher Davis et al.•American Journal of Physical…•2021

  • Shape Statistics

    Open Access•F James Rohlf•Journal of Classification•1999

  • Extensions of the Procrustes Method for the Optimal Superimposition of Landmarks

    F James Rohlf, Dennis E Slice et al.•Systematic Zoology•1990

  • Geomorph

    Open Access•Dean C Adams, Erik Otárola-Castillo et al.•Methods in Ecology and Evolution•2013

  • Semilandmarks in Three Dimensions

    Philipp Gunz, P Mitteroecker et al.•Modern morphometrics in physical…•2006

  • Differences between sliding semi‐landmark methods in geometric morphometrics, with an application to human craniofacial and dental variation

    Open Access•I Pérez, S Ivan Perez et al.•Journal of Anatomy•2006

  • Landmark methods for forms without landmarks

    Open Access•Fred L Bookstein•Medical Image Analysis•1997

  • A method for registration of 3-D shapes

    Open Access•Paul J Besl, Neil David McKay•IEEE Transactions on Pattern…•1992

  • Generalized Procrustes Analysis

    Open Access•J C Gower•Psychometrika•1975

  • Capturing data from three-dimensional surfaces using fuzzy landmarks

    Open Access•Christopher J Valeri, Theodore M Cole et al.•American Journal of Physical…•1998

  • Virtual Anthropology

    Open Access•Gerhard W Weber•American Journal of Physical…•2015

  • Encephalization and diversification of the cranial base in platyrrhine primates

    Open Access•Leandro Aristide, M J Spisak et al.•Journal of Human Evolution•2015

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,22
Citation span2017 - 2021 (5)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae