Brief communication
Artificial cranial modification in K ow S wamp and C ohuna
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8316181 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Arthur C Durband (Department of Sociology Anthropology, and Social Work, Texas Tech University Lubbock TX, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 155 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 173-178 |
| Publication date | 2014-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of Physical Anthropology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-9483 • E-ISSN: 1096-8644 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/ajpa.22563 |
| PMID | 24964764 |
| OpenAlex | W1930458678 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 17 |
The crania from Kow Swamp and Cohuna have been important for a number of debates in Australian paleoanthropology. These crania typically have long, flat foreheads that many workers have cited as evidence of genetic continuity with archaic Indonesian populations, particularly the Ngandong sample. Other scientists have alleged that at least some of the crania from Kow Swamp and the Cohuna skull have been altered through artificial modification, and that the flat foreheads possessed by these individuals are not phylogenetically informative. In this study, several Kow Swamp crania and Cohuna are compared to known modified and unmodified comparative samples. Canonical variates analyses and Mahalanobis distances are generated, and random expectation statistics are used to calculate statistical significance for these tests. The results of this study agree with prior work indicating that a portion of this sample shows evidence for artificial modification of the cranial vault. Many Kow Swamp crania and Cohuna display shape similarities with a population of known modified individuals from New Britain. Kow Swamp 1, 5, and Cohuna show the strongest evidence for modification, but other individuals from this sample also show evidence of culturally manipulated changes in cranial shape. This project provides added support for the argument that at least some Pleistocene Australian groups were practicing artificial cranial modification, and suggests that caution should be used when including these individuals in phylogenetic studies. Am J Phys Anthropol 155:173–178, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc
Archaeology · Biology · Crania · Evolutionary biology · Geography · Population · Sociology · Swamp · Zoology · Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments · Demography · Ecology · Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Evaluating the efficiency of isolated calvaria bones shape changes in the identification and differentiation of artificial cranial modification techniques among pre-Hispanic western and central Mesoamerican populations
Probable Use of Labrets Among the Mid Upper Paleolithic Pavlovian Peoples of Central Europe
A metric assessment of evidence for artificial cranial modification at the Boisman 2 Neolithic cemetery (ca. 5800–5400 14C BP), Primorye, Russian Far East
Intentional cranial modification from the Houtaomuga Site in Jilin, China
Antiquity and geographic distribution of cranial modification among the prehistoric groups of F uego‐ P atagonia, C hile
Biological Anthropology in 2014
Artificial cranial deformation in Kow Swamp 1 and 5
Canonical and principal components of shape
Possible evidence of a cultural practice affecting head growth in some late pleistocene east Asian and Australasian populations
Modern human origins in Australasia
Variation among early North American Crania
Regional continuity in Australasian Pleistocene hominid evolution
Mungo and Kow Swamp
Nacurrie 1
Artificial Cranial Deformation
Artificial cranial deformation and fossil Australians revisited
Artificial cranial deformation in Pleistocene Australians
Identifying artificially deformed crania
Theories of Modern Human Origins
Artificial Cranial Deformation in the Shanidar 1 and 5 Neandertals
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,55 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2025 (11) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |