Molar microwear in extant small‐bodied faunivorous mammals

An analysis of feature density and pit frequency

Datos Bibliográficos

ID8317354
AutoresSuzanne G Strait (Duke University, autor de correspondencia)
Año1993
Volumen92
Número1
Páginas63-79
Fecha de publicación1993-09-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0002-9483 • E-ISSN: 1096-8644
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/ajpa.1330920106
PMID8238292
OpenAlexW2141603865
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas37
Referencias citadas37

This study quantitatively examined molar microwear in nine species of extant small‐bodied faunivorous primates and microchiropterans. Comparative analyses were performed within the food category faunivory, both between hard‐ and soft‐object feeding faunivores and between primarily insectivorous and carnivorous taxa. Additionally, microwear in faunivores was compared to that reported in the literature for frugivorous and folivorous primates. The results indicated that although insectivores and carnivores could not be distinguished by microwear analyses, hard‐object faunivores (i. e., those that primarily consume beetles or actively comminute bone) can be readily distinguished from soft‐object faunivores (i. e., moth, caterpillar, or vertebrate flesh specialists). The hard‐object faunivores consistently exhibited greater pit frequencies (in excess of 40%). Furthermore, comparisons of these microwear data on faunivorous mammals to previous work on frugivorous and folivorous primates (Teaford, 1988, pers. comm.; Teaford and Runestad, 1992, pers. comm.; Teaford and Walker: American Journal of Physical Anthropology 64:191–200, 1984) permitted three observations to be made. 1) Faunivores tend to have higher mean feature densities than either frugivores or folivores, although these differences are not consistently statistically distinct. 2) Faunifores and frugivores that feed on hard‐objects have comparable mean pit frequencies. 3) Although it is impossible to distinguish faunivores and folivores on the basis of metric analysis of gross molar morphology, this distinction can be made on microwear criteria. Both hard‐ and soft‐object faunivores exhibit much higher mean pit frequencies than primarily folivorous species. © 1993 Wiley‐Liss, Inc

Biology · Evolutionary biology · Extant taxon · Frugivore · Habitat · Insectivore · Predation · Zoology · Amphibian and Reptile Biology · Ecology · Primate Behavior and Ecology · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation