Brief communication
Facial fluctuating asymmetry as a marker of sex differences of the response to phenotypic stresses
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8317671 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Barış Özener (0000-0002-5776-4613, Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 143 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 321-324 |
| Publication date | 2010-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of Physical Anthropology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-9483 • E-ISSN: 1096-8644 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/ajpa.21357 |
| PMID | 20623680 |
| OpenAlex | W2019454557 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 19 |
Fluctuating asymmetry (FA) is thought to increase as a result of environmental perturbations during development. A number of studies involving measures of health and developmental stability other than FA have discussed the presumed increased buffering in females relative to males. But, there is little evidence in the literature on FA to support this hypothesis. This research was conducted to determine the level of difference in terms of facial FA between sexes under different environmental conditions. Group 1 included final year students from three high schools in Yenimahalle, a slum district of Ankara (males: N = 163, mean age = 17.55, sd = 0.50; females: N = 141, mean age = 17.48, sd = 0.38). Group 2 included students with higher socioeconomic background and was composed of final year students from three different private schools located in Cankaya ( N = 171, mean age = 17.44, sd = 0.26; females: N = 152, mean age = 17.38, sd = 0.31). Digital images were used to assess the degree of facial asymmetry as measured from eight paired traits and calculated as a composite score. The study shows that the male students had higher facial asymmetry than the female students. However, the present difference reaches a significant level in the low‐socioeconomic status group. As a result, it could be inferred that differences in developmental stability between sexes might emerge under stressful conditions. Am J Phys Anthropol 143:321–324, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc
Asymmetry · Biology · Developmental psychology · Facial symmetry · Fluctuating asymmetry · Population · Socioeconomic status · Sociology · Demography · Ecology · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience · Morphological variations and asymmetry · Psychology · Social Psychology
Does age difference really matter? Facial markers of biological quality and age difference between husband and wife
Analysis of interaction between nutritional and developmental instability in mediaeval population in Wrocław
Cranial fluctuating asymmetry and its relationship with non-specific physiological stress indicators in a contemporary South African cadaveric skeletal sample
Relación entre tratamiento hormonal, cirugía-ortodoncia maxilofacial, traumatismos y malformaciones craneofaciales y la asimetría fluctuante
The relationship between facial shape asymmetry and attractiveness in Mexican students
Developmental patterns of bilateral asymmetry in ancestral puebloans
Facial asymmetry and genetic ancestry in L atin A merican admixed populations
Skull shape asymmetry and the socioeconomic structure of an early medieval central european society
Facial attractiveness signals different aspects of “quality” in women and men
Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection
Cautionary Note on Reporting Eta-Squared Values from Multifactor Anova Designs
Why men have shorter lives than women
Attention‐Deficit hyperactivity disorder (AD/HD) and fluctuating asymmetry (FA) in a college sample
Fluctuating asymmetry of a foraging population
Ontogenetic Patterning of Skeletal Fluctuating Asymmetry in Rhesus Macaques and Humans
Dental fluctuating asymmetry in the Gullah
Fluctuating asymmetry in molar dimensions and discrete morphological traits in Pima Indians
Physical attractiveness and health
The Evolution of Human Physical Attractiveness
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,62 |
| Citation span | 2013 - 2024 (12) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |