A combined morphometric analysis of foot form and its association with sex, stature, and body mass
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8320028 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jacqueline Domjanic (0000-0002-3964-3818, Department of Clothing Technology University of Zagreb Croatia), Horst Seidler (Department of Anthropology University of Vienna Austria), P Mitteroecker (0000-0002-5308-3837, University of Vienna, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 157 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 582-591 |
| Publication date | 2015-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of Physical Anthropology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-9483 • E-ISSN: 1096-8644 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/ajpa.22752 |
| PMID | 25846015 |
| OpenAlex | W2126187362 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 40 |
Objectives : Morphometric analysis of footprints is a classic means for orthopedic diagnosis. In forensics and physical anthropology, it is commonly used for the estimation of stature and body mass. We studied individual variation and sexual dimorphism of foot dimensions and footprint shape by a combination of classic foot measurements and geometric morphometric methods. Methods : Left and right feet of 134 healthy adult males and females were scanned twice with a 3D optical laser scanner, and stature as well as body mass were recorded. Foot length and width were measured on the 3D scans. The 2D footprints were extracted as the plantar‐most 2 mm of the 3D scans and measured with 85 landmarks and semilandmarks. Results : Both foot size and footprint shape are sexually dimorphic and relate to stature and body mass. While dimorphism in foot length largely results from dimorphism in stature, dimorphism in footprint shape partly owes to the dimorphism in BMI. Stature could be estimated well based on foot length ( R 2 = 0.76), whereas body mass was more closely related to foot width ( R 2 = 0.62). Sex could be estimated correctly for 95% of the individuals based on a combination of foot width and length. Discussion : Geometric morphometrics proved to be an effective tool for the detailed analysis of footprint shape. However, for the estimation of stature, body mass, and sex, shape variables did not considerably improve estimates based on foot length and width. Am J Phys Anthropol 157:582–591, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc
Biology · Foot (prosody) · Footprint · Morphometrics · Sexual dimorphism · Zoology · Anatomy · Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies · Gait Recognition and Analysis · Medicine · Morphological variations and asymmetry · Orthodontics
What Was the “Devil’s” Body Size? Reflections on the Body Mass and Stature of the Foresta Hominin Trackmakers (Roccamonfina Volcano, Italy)
A three-dimensional geometric morphometric study of the effects of erosion on the morphologies of modern and prehistoric footprints
From footprint morphometrics to the stature of fossil hominins
Non-invasive methods
Types and distribution of the patterns on ball area of bare footprint
Body mass estimation from footprint size in hominins
Prehistoric human hand and footprints in Quesang on the central Tibetan Plateau from the Bølling-Allerød Interstadial
Early Hominin Foot Morphology Based on 1.5-Million-Year-Old Footprints from Ileret, Kenya
Laetoli Pliocene hominid footprints and bipedalism
Extensions of the Procrustes Method for the Optimal Superimposition of Landmarks
Linear Discrimination, Ordination, and the Visualization of Selection Gradients in Modern Morphometrics
Landmark methods for forms without landmarks
The strange case of the rickety Cossack
Sexual dimorphism in foot length proportionate to stature
Relative foot size and shape to general body size in Javanese, Filipinas and Japanese with special reference to habitual footwear types
Further progress on the Laetoli trails
Hominin stature, body mass, and walking speed estimates based on 1.5 million-year-old fossil footprints at Ileret, Kenya
The growth of the human foot
Growth of the normal foot during childhood and adolescence. Length of the foot and interrelations of foot, stature, and lower extremity as seen in serial records of children between 1–18 years of age
Comparison of cranial ontogenetic trajectories among great apes and humans
Estimation of Sex from the Dimensions of Foot, Footprints, and Shoe
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,78 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2025 (9) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |