Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The relative efficacy of functional and developmental cranial modules for reconstructing global human population history

Bibliographic Data

ID8320170
AuthorsNoreen Von Craman‐taubadel (0000-0002-5263-3892, University of Kent, corresponding author), Noreen Von Cramon‐taubadel
Year2011
Volume146
Issue1
Pages83-93
Publication date2011-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-9483 • E-ISSN: 1096-8644
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/ajpa.21550
PMID21710659
OpenAlexW2080452790
LanguageEN
Citations received31
References cited65

This study tests the relative efficacy of human cranial modules, defined on the basis of developmental and functional criteria, for reconstructing neutral genetic population history. Specifically, two hypotheses were tested: 1) The “basicranial hypothesis” predicts that the endochondrally ossifying basicranium will be more reliable for reconstructing population history than intramembranously ossifying regions of the human cranium. This is based on the assumption that early ossification of the basicranium and its distinct functional constraints produce a cranial structure that is relatively immune to non‐neutral evolutionary forces. 2) The “single function hypothesis” predicts that cranial regions associated with a single (sensory) function are less reliable indicators of neutral genetic history. Here the prediction is based on the logic that complex, multi‐functional, integrated cranial regions are less likely toexhibit homoplasy and, therefore, provide a more accurate morphological proxy for genetic relationships. The congruence between craniometric affinity matrices and neutral genetic population matrices based on autosomal microsatellite and classical markers was assessed using a series of Mantel and Dow‐Cheverud tests. The results did not support the predictions of the “basicranial hypothesis,” as the endochondrally ossifying basicranium was not significantly more congruent with the genetic data than intramembraneously ossifying modules. Moreover, although the results provided some support for the “single function hypothesis,” defining cranial modules on the basis of anatomical or functional complexity did not provide a consistent means of predicting their phylogenetic efficacy. These results have important implications for building an accurate inference model of cranial evolution in the human fossil record. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2011. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc

Biology · Evolutionary biology · Ossification · Population · Anatomy · Demography · Forensic and Genetic Research · Genetic diversity and population structure · Morphological variations and asymmetry

  • Global human mandibular variation reflects differences in agricultural and hunter-gatherer subsistence strategies

    Open Access•Noreen Von Craman‐taubadel, Noreen Von Cramon-Taubadel•Proceedings of the National…•2011

  • Human Peopling and Population Dynamics in Sicily

    Open Access•G Lauria, Luca Sìneo•Heritage•2023

  • A three‐dimensional geometric morphometrics view of the cranial shape variation and population history in the New World

    Open Access•Manon Galland, Martin Frie et al.•American Journal of Human Biology•2016

  • The population history of Central Europe in the Early Bronze Age (2200/2100–1600/1500 BC) - a craniometric approach

    Open Access•Tamás Szeniczey, Eszter Melis et al.•Archaeological and Anthropological…•2025

  • A Study of Bilateral Asymmetry Pattern in the Eye Orbit and Nose of the Joseon Dynasty Skeletal Group Using Geometric Morphometrics

    Open Access•Hyunwoo Jung, E J Woo et al.•Korean Journal of Physical…•2016

  • A Craniometric Perspective on the Transition to Agriculture in Europe

    Ron Pinhasi, Noreen Von Craman‐taubadel et al.•Human Biology•2012

  • Is the area of the orbital opening in humans related to climate

    Open Access•Agnieszka Tomaszewska, B Kwiatkowska et al.•American Journal of Human Biology•2015

  • The befuddling nature of mouse lemur hands and feet at Bezà Mahafaly, SW Madagascar

    Open Access•Gina Agostini, Emilienne Rasoazanabary et al.•American Journal of Primatology•2017

  • The assessment of the relationship between the traits of temporal muscle and the massiveness of the supraorbital region of the Homo sapiens crania including the influence of the neurocranial shape and size of the occlusal surface of the upper molars – preliminary study

    Open Access•W Nowaczewska, Katarzyna Górka et al.•Anthropological Review•2023

  • Craniofacial variation of the Xiongnu Iron Age nomads of Mongolia reveals their possible origins and population history

    Open Access•Ryan W Schmidt, Noriko Seguchi•Quaternary International•2016

  • The microevolution of modern human cranial variation

    Open Access•Noreen Von Craman‐taubadel, Noreen Von Cramon-Taubadel•Annals of Human Biology•2014

  • Shape analyses and the human skeleton

    Kimberly A Plomp•World Archaeology•2026

  • Examining biological continuity across the late holocene occupation of the aleutian islands using cranial morphometrics and quantitative genetic permutation

    Open Access•Blaine Maley•American Journal of Physical…•2016

  • Random genetic drift, natural selection, and noise in human cranial evolution

    Open Access•Charles C Roseman•American Journal of Physical…•2016

  • Testing the equivalence of modern human cranial covariance structure

    Open Access•Noreen Von Craman‐taubadel, Lauren Schroeder•American Journal of Physical…•2016

  • Examining developmental plasticity in the skeletal system through a sensitive developmental windows framework

    Open Access•Cait B Mcpherson•American Journal of Physical…•2021

  • Moderate climate signature in cranial anatomy of late holocene human populations from Southern South America

    Open Access•Lumila Paula Menéndez•American Journal of Physical…•2018

  • Resolving relationships between several Neolithic and Mesolithic populations in Northern Eurasia using geometric morphometrics

    Open Access•Ekaterina Stansfield, Anna Rasskasova et al.•American Journal of Physical…•2017

  • The relative efficacy of the cranium and os coxa for taxonomic assessment in macaques

    Open Access•Brittany Kenyon‐flatt, Mark A Conaway et al.•American Journal of Physical…•2020

  • Are human hands and feet affected by climate? A test of A llen's rule

    Open Access•Lia Betti, Stephen J Lycett et al.•American Journal of Physical…•2015

  • Genomic validation of the differential preservation of population history in modern human cranial anatomy

    Open Access•Hugo Reyes‐centeno, Silvia Ghirotto et al.•American Journal of Physical…•2017

  • Facial morphologies of Middle Pleistocene Europe

    Open Access•Siri Topsø Olsen, Suzanna White•Journal of Human Evolution•2025

  • The contribution of subsistence to global human cranial variation

    Open Access•Marlijn L Noback, K Harvati•Journal of Human Evolution•2015

  • The relative correspondence of cranial and genetic distances in papionin taxa and the impact of allometric adjustments

    Open Access•Heather F Smith, Noreen Von Craman‐taubadel et al.•Journal of Human Evolution•2015

  • Dental phenotypic shape variation supports a multiple dispersal model for anatomically modern humans in Southeast Asia

    Open Access•Julien Corny, Manon Galland et al.•Journal of Human Evolution•2017

  • A 3-D geometric morphometric study of intraspecific variation in the ontogeny of the temporal bone in modern Homo sapiens

    Heather F Smith, Terrence B Ritzman et al.•Journal of Human Evolution•2013

  • Human Pelvis and Long Bones Reveal Differential Preservation of Ancient Population History and Migration Out of Africa

    Lia Betti, Noreen Von Craman‐taubadel et al.•Human Biology•2012

  • Biodistance Evidence of Gene Flow from the Kayenta Region

    Rachael M Byrd, Rachael Byrd•KIVA•2019

  • A new approach to exploratory data analysis in hominin phylogenetic reconstruction

    Open Access•Joanna R Gautney•Journal of Human Evolution•2023

  • The relative congruence of cranial and genetic estimates of hominoid taxon relationships

    Open Access•Noreen Von Craman‐taubadel, Noreen Von Cramon-Taubadel et al.•Journal of Human Evolution•2012

  • Prehistory and Protohistory in Sicily. A Geometric Morphometrics Approach to Study the Biological History of Early Human Peopling of the Island

    Open Access•G Lauria, Luca Sìneo•Anthropological Review•2025

  • Reliability of cranial morphology in reconstructing Neanderthal phylogeny

    K Harvati, T D Weaver•Neanderthals Revisited•2006

  • Developmental Integration and the Evolution of Pleiotropy

    James M Cheverud•American Zoologist•1996

  • Perspective

    Open Access•Günter P Wagner, Lee Altenberg•Evolution•1996

  • Late Pleistocene Human Skull from Hofmeyr, South Africa, and Modern Human Origins

    Open Access•Frederick E Grine, Richard M Bailey et al.•Science•2007

  • Phenotypic, Genetic, and Environmental Morphological Integration in the Cranium

    Open Access•James M Cheverud•Evolution•1982

  • The Evolutionary Role of Modularity and Integration in the Hominoid Cranium

    Open Access•P Mitteroecker, Fred L Bookstein et al.•Evolution•2008

  • Genetic Structure of Human Populations

    Open Access•Noah A Rosenberg, Jonathan K Pritchard et al.•Science•2002

  • Clines, Clusters, and the Effect of Study Design on the Inference of Human Population Structure

    Open Access•Noah A Rosenberg, Saurabh Mahajan et al.•PLoS Genetics•2005

  • The effect of ancient population bottlenecks on human phenotypic variation

    Open Access•Andrea Manica, William Amos et al.•Nature•2007

  • Climate Signatures in the Morphological Differentiation of Worldwide Modern Human Populations

    Open Access•Mark Hubbe, Tsunehiko Hanihara et al.•The Anatomical Record•2009

  • Detecting interregionally diversifying natural selection on modern human cranial form by using matched molecular and morphometric data

    Open Access•Charles C Roseman•Proceedings of the National…•2004

  • Morphometrics and hominoid phylogeny

    Open Access•Charles A Lockwood, William H Kimbel et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2004

  • Human cranial anatomy and the differential preservation of population history and climate signatures

    Open Access•K Harvati, T D Weaver•The Anatomical Record Part A:…•2006

  • Which cranial regions reflect molecular distances reliably in humans? Evidence from three‐dimensional morphology

    Open Access•Heather F Smith•American Journal of Human Biology•2009

  • The primate cranial base

    Open Access•D E Lieberman, Callum F Ro et al.•American Journal of Physical…•2000

  • Insights from a quantitative genetic approach to human morphological evolution

    Open Access•Noreen Von Craman‐taubadel, Noreen Von Cramon‐taubadel et al.•Evolutionary Anthropology Issues…•2009

  • Cranial Variation in Man. A Study by Multivariate Analysis of Patterns of Difference Among Recent Human Populations

    Open Access•William W Howells•Journal of Human Evolution•1977

  • Spatial autocorrelation invalidates the Dow‐Cheverud test

    Open Access•Neal L Oden•American Journal of Physical…•1992

  • Comparison of distance matrices in studies of population structure and genetic microdifferentiation

    Open Access•Malcolm M Dow, James M Cheverud•American Journal of Physical…•1985

  • Genetic, geographic, and environmental correlates of human temporal bone variation

    Open Access•Heather F Smith, Claire E Terhune et al.•American Journal of Physical…•2007

  • The relative role of drift and selection in shaping the human skull

    Open Access•Lia Betti, François Balloux et al.•American Journal of Physical…•2010

  • Patterns of phenotypic covariation and correlation in modern humans as viewed from morphological integration

    Open Access•Rolando González‐josé, Silvina Van der Molen et al.•American Journal of Physical…•2004

  • The problem of assessing landmark error in geometric morphometrics

    Open Access•Noreen Von Craman‐taubadel, Noreen Von Cramon‐taubadel et al.•American Journal of Physical…•2007

  • Craniometric variation among modern human populations

    Open Access•J H Relethford•American Journal of Physical…•1994

  • Brief Communication

    Open Access•Noreen Von Craman‐taubadel, Stephen J Lycett•American Journal of Physical…•2008

  • Craniodental variation in Paranthropus boisei

    Open Access•B Wood, D E Lieberman•American Journal of Physical…•2001

  • Population‐specific deviations of global human craniometric variation from a neutral model

    Open Access•J H Relethford•American Journal of Physical…•2010

  • Apportionment of global human genetic diversity based on craniometrics and skin color

    Open Access•J H Relethford•American Journal of Physical…•2002

  • Matrix correlation analysis in anthropology and genetics

    Open Access•Peter E Smouse, Jeffrey C Long•American Journal of Physical…•1992

  • Congruence of individual cranial bone morphology and neutral molecular affinity patterns in modern humans

    Open Access•Noreen Von Craman‐taubadel•American Journal of Physical…•2009

  • Genetic and environmental contributions to variation in baboon cranial morphology

    Open Access•Charles C Roseman, Katherine E Willmore et al.•American Journal of Physical…•2010

  • Phylogenetic analysis of the African papionin basicranium using 3‐D geometric morphometrics

    Open Access•Christopher C Gilbert•American Journal of Physical…•2011

  • Multivariate apportionment of global human craniometric diversity

    Open Access•Charles C Roseman, T D Weaver•American Journal of Physical…•2004

  • Variation in human nasal height and breadth

    Open Access•Robert G Franciscus, Jeffrey C Long•American Journal of Physical…•1991

  • A functional approach to craniology

    Open Access•Melvin L Moss, Richard W Young•American Journal of Physical…•1960

  • Homoplasy and earlyHomo

    Open Access•D E Lieberman, B Wood et al.•Journal of Human Evolution•1996

  • Evolutionary Relationships Among Prehistoric Human Populations

    I Pérez, Bernal et al.•Human Biology•2007

  • Global Patterns of Isolation by Distance Based on Genetic and Morphological Data

    J H Relethford, John Relethford•Human Biology•2004

  • Linear Measurements of the Neurocranium Are Better Indicators of Population Differences than Those of the Facial Skeleton

    Gábor Holló, László Szathmáry et al.•Human Biology•2010

  • Craniometric Similarities Within and Between Human Populations in Comparison with Neutral Genetic Data

    A Strau, André Straus et al.•Human Biology•2010

  • Do homoiologies impede phylogenetic analyses of the fossil hominids? An assessment based on extant papionin craniodental morphology

    Open Access•Stephen J Lycett, M Collard•Journal of Human Evolution•2005

  • Revisiting the homoiology hypothesis

    Open Access•Noreen Von Craman‐taubadel, Noreen Von Cramon-Taubadel•Journal of Human Evolution•2009

  • Basicranial influence on overall cranial shape

    Open Access•D E Lieberman, O M Pearson et al.•Journal of Human Evolution•2000

  • Homoplasy and the early hominid masticatory system

    Open Access•M Collard, B Wood•Journal of Human Evolution•2001

  • Hominin homoiology

    Open Access•M Collard, B Wood•Journal of Human Evolution•2007

Unique citing works31
Citations per year2,07
Citation span2011 - 2026 (16)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 31

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae