The Embodied Mother
Commentary on Kristeva
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8334792 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rosemary H Balsam (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 62 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 87-100 |
| Publication date | 2014-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-0651 • E-ISSN: 1941-2460 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0003065114523781 |
| PMID | 24610760 |
| OpenAlex | W1988739332 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 17 |
J ulia Kristeva is one of the very few psychoanalytic writers who regard the female essence as a central given in any viable theory of mind, not an add-on or “special” topic that can then be set aside to get on with the real work of analyzing the mind of the subject. Females (and thus, using this term as meaning specifically the biologically sexed body, and thus implicitly the sexed bodies also of males, or in-betweens) are central to life, and the life of the mind. This truth was born into Freud’s original creation of psychoanalysis. Beyond Freud, I myself distinguish sex from gender, the former being biological and the latter being a fluid mentalized concept. Judith Butler (1993), say, believes that they are indistinguishable, and that the body’s actual biological sex is entirely animated by sociocultural construction or linguistic interpretation. In psychoanalysis I do believe that we are searching for the freedom to examine a maximal fluidity of human behavior and psychic capacity, but while recognizing the limits of our physicality—which can of course be radically altered, but only by external physical means. The work of the imagination, however, is boundless and far outranges anyone’s biological body. We have strayed far from the centrality of libido in many of our newer theories. Not so Kristeva. She uses “motherhood” here to set ablaze its eroticism, and she complains (as do I) about modern theory’s preoccupation with the individual’s object relations, a focus so exclusive that often the body is forgotten (Balsam 2012). In her work Kristeva characteristically maintains a dialogue with Freud. She has broken the
Embodied cognition · Epistemology · Eroticism · Human sexuality · Instinct · Interpretation (philosophy) · Meaning (existential) · Object (grammar) · Psychic · Psychoanalysis · Psychoanalytic theory · Sociology · Subject (documents) · Gender Studies · Philosophy · Psychoanalysis and Social Critique · Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics · Psychology · Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Heterogeneity of the Freudian sign
Maternal and paternal functions in the formation of subjectivity
Oedipality and oedipal complexes reconsidered
Reckoning with sexuality
The Sounds of Silence
Moving from Within The Maternal
Maternal Erotic Transferences and the Work of the Abject
Creativity and the Erotic Dimensions of the Analytic Field
Becoming raced
Powers of Horror
An Experiment in Leisure
Motherhood and Sexuality
A Genuinely Developmental Theory of Sexual Enjoyment and Its Implications for Psychoanalytic Technique
(RE)membering The Female Body In Psychoanalysis
The Otherness of Sexuality
Parenthood As A Developmental Phase
Bodies that matter
Women of the Wednesday Society
La reliance, ou de l'érotisme maternel
The Laugh of the Medusa
Bodies That Matter
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2025 (9) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |