A Qualitative Exploration of the Experiences of Disclosing Non-Monogamy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8358366 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Joel Anderson (0000-0003-3649-2003, La Trobe University, corresponding author), Alena Bondarchuk-McLaughlin (0009-0007-0233-1419, La Trobe University), Scarlet Rosa (0009-0007-1360-8727), Karen D Goldschlager (Australian Catholic University), Jordan D X Hinton (0000-0003-0922-5620, La Trobe University) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 1481-1495 |
| Publication date | 2025-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Archives of Sexual Behavior (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0004-0002 • E-ISSN: 1573-2800 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10508-025-03119-0 |
| PMID | 40128496 |
| OpenAlex | W4408846002 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 34 |
Non-monogamy refers to a set of relationship identities and structures that go against societal norms and expectations of “typical” relationships (i.e., monogamous heteronormative dyadic relationships). As such, non-monogamous individuals often conceal this identity and then need to engage in continuous decision-making processes regarding when and how to disclose, due in part to the structural barriers, stigma, and discrimination faced by this population. This study sought to explore the experiences of the disclosure of consensual (or ethical) non-monogamy and the factors impacting on the decision to disclose across a range of environments. Data on lived experiences were explored by conducting qualitative semi-structured interviews with 32 non-monogamous adults living in Australia. Based on grounded theory, four key themes were identified during the analysis of the data: (1) decisions around how and when to disclosure are complex, (2) responses to disclosure are typically negative, (3) structural barriers typically prevent disclosure, and (4) unless specifically trained, healthcare providers are typically uninformed about non-monogamy. These findings are discussed in relation to providing a base model of disclosure for future research to build upon and to enhance understanding of systemic and healthcare-related issues faced by this population. This research adds to the current understanding of factors impacting disclosure, with possible clinical implications and suggestions for future research discussed
Grounded theory · Health care · Identity (music) · Population · Qualitative research · Self-disclosure · Set (abstract data type) · Sociology · Islamic Finance and Banking Studies · LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy · Marriage and Sexual Relationships · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology
How perceived mate value discrepancies are related to jealousy, mate guarding, intrasexual competition, and partner conflict in monogamous and consensually non-monogamous relationships
Countering the ‘monogamy-superiority’ myth
Exploring How Bi + People Differently Experience Minority Stress Events According to the Gender of Their Partner/s
Countering the Monogamy-Superiority Myth
A Critical Examination of Popular Assumptions About the Benefits and Outcomes of Monogamous Relationships
Perceived Stigmatization and Disclosure among Individuals in Consensually Nonmonogamous Relationships
Internalized Consensual Non-Monogamy Negativity and Relationship Quality Among People Engaged in Polyamory, Swinging, and Open Relationships
Exploring Minority Stress and Resilience in a Polyamorous Sample
Defining Polyamory
Assessing Implicit Associations with Consensual Non-monogamy Among U.S. Early Emerging Adults
The protective role of identity integration against internalized sexual prejudice for religious gay men
Counting polyamorists who count
Polyamory and its ‘Others’
Understanding Non-Monogamies
The Fewer the Merrier
Perceptions of monogamy, nonconsensual nonmonogamy and consensual nonmonogamy at the intersections of race and gender
Three’s a crowd
Wanting ‘the whole loaf’
Personality Correlates of Desire to Engage in Consensual Non-monogamy among Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Individuals
Countering the Monogamy-Superiority Myth
A Closer Look at Relationship Structures
Satisfaction with Open Sexual Agreements in Australian Gay Men’s Relationships
Are there “Better” and “Worse” Ways to be Consensually Non-Monogamous (CNM)
Australian Gay Men’s Satisfaction with Sexual Agreements
Introduction to the Special Section on Consensual Non-Monogamy
Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations
Intersectional Narrative Practice with Queer Muslim Clients
Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research
Coding In-depth Semistructured Interviews
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |