Setting stream naturalisation goals to achieve ecosystem improvement in urbanising greenfield catchments
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8360416 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael J Sammonds (The University of Melbourne, corresponding author), Geoff Vietz (0000-0002-7407-6601, The University of Melbourne), G J Vietz |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 386-395 |
| Publication date | 2015-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Area (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0004-0894 • E-ISSN: 1475-4762 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/area.12181 |
| OpenAlex | W2152349956 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 18 |
Expanding cities worldwide are gradually absorbing peripheral greenfield streams that often require some level of improvement to fulfil their role as central public spaces in the urban landscape. Restoration is often impossible due to physical constraints imposed by urban development coupled with fundamental biophysical modification from previous land use. However, it is possible to provide social amenity and improve stream ecosystem condition through the process of naturalisation – an implicitly social undertaking reliant on the well‐informed participation of stakeholders. Urbanising greenfield sites present a special case of naturalisation that does not include a local community as it is absent in advance of development. The authors present a case study where they were involved as advising scientists in a stream naturalisation project in M elbourne, A ustralia. In the case study, the lack of this founder community in the consultation process coupled with limited integration between other stakeholders resulted in naturalisation goals unlikely to result in improved in‐stream ecosystem condition. The final design adopted some features that extended beyond baseline regulatory standards for drainage schemes in new developments, but with insufficient provision for catchment‐scale treatment of stormwater runoff, which has been recognised as a primary source of urban stream degradation. This study expands the concept of naturalisation – originally developed in the context of rural stream management – to include urbanising greenfield catchments where advocacy groups and urban planning officials from local government hold chief responsibility to represent the values and attitudes of the founder community in the consultation process
Amenity · Business · Citizenship · Context (archaeology) · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Naturalisation · Political science · Stream restoration · STREAMS · Urban stream · Environmental Science · Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes · Law · Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
The urban stream syndrome
Participation and Environmental Governance
Urban water management in cities
Overcoming the ‘value‐action gap’ in environmental policy
Mind the Gap
Has river rehabilitation begun? Social perspectives from the Upper Hunter catchment, New South Wales, Australia
Why rehabilitate urban river systems
Implementing Participatory Water Management
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,18 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2018 (4) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |