Shell games’, displacement and the reordering of boreal landscapes in A lberta, C anada
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8360751 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ryan Hackett (York University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 153-160 |
| Publication date | 2016-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Area (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0004-0894 • E-ISSN: 1475-4762 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/area.12158 |
| OpenAlex | W1858763933 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 20 |
Terrestrial conservation offsets have become a leading solution to the ecological consequences of A lberta's oil sands boom. The broad‐based support for terrestrial offsets in the province is representative of a larger global trend toward the rescaling of environmental governance and greater use of market‐based conservation models. A well‐developed critical literature now documents some of the overarching logics and material implications of these ‘neoliberal’ approaches to conservation. Much of this scholarship has drawn on M arxian notions of accumulation by dispossession to raise concern that the use of market‐based approaches serves to widen dispossession through increased enclosure and privatisation of both nonhuman nature and political discourse on issues of environment. While in many instances these concerns are justified, the mechanisms through which market‐based conservation channels benefits to powerful societal actors may be more complicated than often assumed. Drawing from recent empirical research on attempts to establish markets in terrestrial conservation offsets in A lberta, C anada, this paper complicates some of the dominant narratives of privatisation associated with market‐based conservation initiatives. Market‐based conservation may, in some instances, be employed to expand a functionally public domain as a means of lubricating private wealth generation, suggesting the need for a more nuanced understanding of the relationship between market‐based conservation, dispossession and accumulation
Boom · Corporate governance · Economic growth · Economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Scholarship · Sociology · Environmental Conservation and Management · Environmental Science · Mining and Resource Management · Water Governance and Infrastructure
Neoliberal Conservation and the Corporate Governance of Biodiversity
Offsetting dispossession? Terrestrial conservation offsets and First Nation treaty rights in Alberta, Canada
No net loss of what, for whom
Environmental displacement
Emerging research methods in environmental displacement and forced migration research
Compounded extraction
Not Wanted in the Boundary
After the Green Rush? Biodiversity Offsets, Uranium Power and the ‘Calculus of Casualties’ in Greening Growth
Ecosystem services
The Good, the Bad, and the Contradictory
Capitalism and Conservation
The “Commons” Versus the “Commodity”
Property, Markets, and Dispossession
NatureTM Inc
Reconstructing history, grounding claims to space
Market-oriented conservation governance
Payments for Ecosystem Services in Mexico
Market Masquerades
Governance Innovation and the Citizen
Banking Nature? The Spectacular Financialisation of Environmental Conservation
The Nature That Capital Can See
Towards a Synthesized Critique of Neoliberal Biodiversity Conservation
Articulation between Neoliberal and State-Oriented Environmental Regulation
Green Grabbing
Landscape-Scale Prioritization Process for Private Land Conservation in Alberta
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,55 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2026 (12) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |