Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Shell games’, displacement and the reordering of boreal landscapes in A lberta, C anada

Bibliographic Data

ID8360751
AuthorsRyan Hackett (York University, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume48
Issue2
Pages153-160
Publication date2016-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueArea (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0004-0894 • E-ISSN: 1475-4762
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/area.12158
OpenAlexW1858763933
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited20

Terrestrial conservation offsets have become a leading solution to the ecological consequences of A lberta's oil sands boom. The broad‐based support for terrestrial offsets in the province is representative of a larger global trend toward the rescaling of environmental governance and greater use of market‐based conservation models. A well‐developed critical literature now documents some of the overarching logics and material implications of these ‘neoliberal’ approaches to conservation. Much of this scholarship has drawn on M arxian notions of accumulation by dispossession to raise concern that the use of market‐based approaches serves to widen dispossession through increased enclosure and privatisation of both nonhuman nature and political discourse on issues of environment. While in many instances these concerns are justified, the mechanisms through which market‐based conservation channels benefits to powerful societal actors may be more complicated than often assumed. Drawing from recent empirical research on attempts to establish markets in terrestrial conservation offsets in A lberta, C anada, this paper complicates some of the dominant narratives of privatisation associated with market‐based conservation initiatives. Market‐based conservation may, in some instances, be employed to expand a functionally public domain as a means of lubricating private wealth generation, suggesting the need for a more nuanced understanding of the relationship between market‐based conservation, dispossession and accumulation

Boom · Corporate governance · Economic growth · Economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Scholarship · Sociology · Environmental Conservation and Management · Environmental Science · Mining and Resource Management · Water Governance and Infrastructure

  • Neoliberal Conservation and the Corporate Governance of Biodiversity

    Open Access•Lucie Wiart•Journal of Business Ethics•2026

  • Offsetting dispossession? Terrestrial conservation offsets and First Nation treaty rights in Alberta, Canada

    Open Access•Ryan Hackett•Geoforum•2015

  • No net loss of what, for whom

    Open Access•Oliver Taherzadeh, Peter Howley•Environment Development and…•2018

  • Environmental displacement

    Open Access•Elizabeth Lunstrum, Pablo S Bose et al.•Area•2016

  • Emerging research methods in environmental displacement and forced migration research

    Open Access•Joseph T Miller, Anvy Thai Vu•Geography Compass•2021

  • Compounded extraction

    Open Access•Silvia Secchi•Environment and Planning E Nature…•2025

  • Not Wanted in the Boundary

    Open Access•John Sandlos•Canadian Historical Review•2008

  • After the Green Rush? Biodiversity Offsets, Uranium Power and the ‘Calculus of Casualties’ in Greening Growth

    Open Access•Sullivan•Human Geography•2013

  • Ecosystem services

    Open Access•Jason Dempsey, Jessica Dempsey et al.•Progress in Human Geography•2012

  • The Good, the Bad, and the Contradictory

    Open Access•Wolfram H Dressler, Wolfram Dressler et al.•World Development•2010

  • Capitalism and Conservation

    Open Access•Dan Brockington, Rosaleen Duffy et al.•Antipode•2010

  • The “Commons” Versus the “Commodity”

    Open Access•Karen Bakker•Antipode•2007

  • Property, Markets, and Dispossession

    Open Access•Becky Mansfield•Antipode•2007

  • NatureTM Inc

    Open Access•Murat Arsel, Bram Büscher•Development and Change•2012

  • Reconstructing history, grounding claims to space

    Elizabeth Lunstrum•South African Geographical Journal•2010

  • Market-oriented conservation governance

    Open Access•Rainer Roth, Robin Roth et al.•Geoforum•2012

  • Payments for Ecosystem Services in Mexico

    Kathleen Mcafee, Elizabeth N Shapiro•Annals of the Association of…•2010

  • Market Masquerades

    Open Access•Sarah Milne, Bill Adams•Development and Change•2012

  • Governance Innovation and the Citizen

    Open Access•E Swyngedouw•Urban Studies•2005

  • Banking Nature? The Spectacular Financialisation of Environmental Conservation

    Open Access•Sullivan, Sian Sullivan•Antipode•2012

  • The Nature That Capital Can See

    Open Access•Morgan M Robertson, Morgan Robertson•Environment and Planning D…•2006

  • Towards a Synthesized Critique of Neoliberal Biodiversity Conservation

    Bram Büscher, Sullivan et al.•Capitalism Nature Socialism•2012

  • Articulation between Neoliberal and State-Oriented Environmental Regulation

    Open Access•Becky Mansfield•Environment and Planning A…•2007

  • Green Grabbing

    Open Access•James Fairhead, Macedward Leach et al.•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2012

  • Landscape-Scale Prioritization Process for Private Land Conservation in Alberta

    Open Access•Sean Ryan, Lorelei Hanson et al.•Human Ecology•2014

Unique citing works6
Citations per year0,55
Citation span2015 - 2026 (12)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae