The Death Penalty in China Today
Kill Fewer, Kill Cautiously
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8368790 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Susan Trevaske (0000-0002-1060-2182, Griffith University, corresponding author), Susan Trevaskes |
| Year | 2008 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 393-413 |
| Publication date | 2008-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Asian Survey (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0004-4687 • E-ISSN: 1533-838X |
| Publisher | University of California Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1525/as.2008.48.3.393 |
| OpenAlex | W2089120347 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 1 |
This paper examines a recent debate at the highest level of China's politicolegal leadership on the application of the death penalty. The debate centers around the interpretation of a new criminal justice policy called “balancing leniency and severity” and around limiting the death penalty to all but the most egregious criminals
China · Criminal justice · Criminology · Economics · Interpretation (philosophy · Law and economics · Limiting · Political science · Sociology · Computer Science · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Engineering · International Law and Human Rights · Law · Torture, Ethics, and Law
The Next Frontier
The predictors of decisions to grant parole in China
The Politics of Crime, Punishment, and Social Order in East Asia
Old ‘counter-revolution’, new ‘terrorism
Abolishing the Death Penalty Worldwide
The Politics of China's Death Penalty Reform in the Context of Global Abolitionism
The Shifting Sands of Punishment in China in the Era of “Harmonious Society
Political Ideology, the Party, and Politicking
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,47 |
| Citation span | 2009 - 2022 (14) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |