Why and How Umbrella Movement Participants Ran in the Authoritarian Elections in Hong Kong

Bibliographic Data

ID8370804
AuthorsChit Wai John Mok (0000-0002-1366-4899, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume60
Issue6
Pages1142-1171
Publication date2020-12-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAsian Survey (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0004-4687 • E-ISSN: 1533-838X
PublisherUniversity of California Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1525/as.2020.60.6.1142
OpenAlexW3111938624
LanguageEN
Citations received6

Why do social movement participants turn to elections to advance their goals? Little scholarship has examined movement–election connections at the micro level, and cases from nondemocratic settings are few. After the 2014 Umbrella Movement in Hong Kong failed to achieve substantive results, very few occupiers ran as candidates in the next two general elections. Drawing on interviews with Umbrella candidates and campaign assistants, I argue that after being politicized by the occupation, those candidates used the authoritarian elections to prolong their challenge. They ran to prove that the occupation, though it had failed, did enjoy popular support, thus turning the elections into electoral “moments”: eruptions of civic energy. Their campaigns were also direct challenges to the existing parties. However, they were constrained by electoral logic. Candidates therefore devised various tactics to justify their decision, and to differentiate themselves from conventional candidates

Authoritarianism · Democracy · Movement (music · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Ran · Scholarship · Sociology · Computer Science · Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics · Law · Public Administration

Tools

Open DOI