Rearmament and Japan
Thoughts on a Familiar Bogey
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8373205 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Atsushi Oi (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1961 |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pages | 10-15 |
| Publication date | 1961-09-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Asian Survey (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0004-4687 • E-ISSN: 1533-838X |
| Publisher | University of California Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2307/3023694 |
| OpenAlex | W4250101542, W2072379350 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
Research Article| September 01 1961 Rearmament and Japan: Thoughts on a Familiar Bogey Atsushi Oi Atsushi Oi Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Memorandum (Institute of Pacific Relations, American Council) (1932) 1 (7): 10–15. https://doi.org/10.2307/3023694 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Atsushi Oi; Rearmament and Japan: Thoughts on a Familiar Bogey. Memorandum (Institute of Pacific Relations, American Council) 28 April 1932; 1 (7): 10–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3023694 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAsian Survey Search This content is only available via PDF. Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content
Citation · Download · Icon · Information retrieval · Library science · Memorandum · Memorandum of understanding · Political science · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Intelligence, Security, War Strategy · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Japanese History and Culture · Law · Military History and Strategy · Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.02 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1962 - 1962 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |