Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

The Hawking Information Loss Paradox

The Anatomy of Controversy

Dados Bibliográficos

ID8396249
AutoresGustave Belot, John Earman, Laura Ruetsche (0000-0001-8213-3445)
Ano1999
Volume50
Fascículo2
Páginas189-229
Data de publicação1999-06-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoThe British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0007-0882 • E-ISSN: 1464-3537
EditoraOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/bjps/50.2.189
OpenAlexW1971944719
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas23
Referências citadas38

Stephen Hawking has argued that universes containing evaporating black holes can evolve from pure initial states to mixed final ones. Such evolution is non-unitary and so contravenes fundamental quantum principles on which Hawking's analysis was based. It disables the retrodiction of the universe's initial state from its final one, and portends the time-asymmetry of quantum gravity. Small wonder that Hawking's paradox has met with considerable resistance. Here we use a simple result for C*-algebras to offer an argument for pure-to-mixed state evolution in black hole evaporation, and review responses to the Hawking paradox with respect to how effectively they rebut this argument.

Argument (complex analysis) · Black hole (networking) · Black hole complementarity · Black hole information paradox · Entropy (arrow of time) · Epistemology · Hawking · Hawking radiation · Micro black hole · Physics · Quantum · Quantum gravity · Quantum mechanics · Theoretical physics · Unitary state · Universe · Wonder · Black Holes and Theoretical Physics · Computer Science · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories · Law · Mathematical Physics · Medicine · Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories · Philosophy

  • Philosophical Aspects of Quantum Field Theory

    Open Access•Laura Ruetsche•Philosophy Compass•2012

  • Does Black Hole Complementarity Answer Hawking's Information Loss Paradox

    Open Access•Peter Bokulich•Philosophy of Science•2005

  • How Determinism Can Fail in Classical Physics and How Quantum Physics Can (Sometimes) Provide a Cure

    Open Access•John Earman•Philosophy of Science•2008

  • Interpreting Quantum Field Theory

    Open Access•Laura Ruetsche•Philosophy of Science•2002

  • Not the Measurement Problem’s Problem

    Open Access•Saakshi Dulani•Philosophy of Science•2025

  • The Great Loop

    Open Access•Baptiste Le Bihan•Journal for General Philosophy of…•2026

  • On black hole complementarity

    Open Access•Jeroen Van Dongen, Sebastian de Haro•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2004

  • The case for black hole thermodynamics part I

    Open Access•David Wallace•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2018

  • Emergence in holographic scenarios for gravity

    Open Access•Dennis Dieks, Jeroen Van Dongen et al.•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2015

  • Weyling the time away

    Open Access•Aristidis Arageorgis, John Earman et al.•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2002

  • Conceptual analysis of black hole entropy in string theory

    Open Access•Sebastian de Haro, Jeroen Van Dongen et al.•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2020

  • Interpreting quantum gravity

    Open Access•Dean Rickles•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2005

  • What can we learn (and not learn) from thought experiments in black hole thermodynamics

    Open Access•Rawad El Skaf, Patricia Palacios•Synthese•2022

  • Essential self-adjointness

    Open Access•John Earman•Synthese•2009

  • Defining a crisis

    Open Access•Kathleen Crowther•Synthese•2021

  • Black Hole Remnants and Classical vs. Quantum Gravity

    Open Access•Peter Bokulich•Philosophy of Science•2001

  • Why Quantize Gravity (or Any Other Field for That Matter)

    Open Access•Nick Huggett, Craig Callender•Philosophy of Science•2001

  • A Role for the Fauxrizon in the Semiclassical Limit of a Fuzzball

    Open Access•Mike D Schneider•Philosophy of Science•2024

  • Singularities and Scalar Fields

    Open Access•James Mattingly•Philosophy of Science•2001

  • Is the Universe Fundamentally a Density Matrix

    Saakshi Dulani, Alyssa Ney•The British Journal for the…•2025

  • Unpacking Black Hole Complementarity

    Siddharth Muthukrishnan•The British Journal for the…•2023

  • The Black Hole Idealization Paradox

    Dominic John Ryder•The British Journal for the…•2024

  • Philosophical Aspects of Quantum Field Theory

    Open Access•Laura Ruetsche•Philosophy Compass•2012

  • The Arrow of Time in Quantum Gravity

    Open Access•Chuang Liu•Philosophy of Science•1993

  • Bangs, Crunches, Whimpers, and Shrieks

    Craig Callender, John Earman•The Philosophical Review•1998

Obras citantes distintas23
Citações por ano0,92
Intervalo de citações2001 - 2026 (26)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 18
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae