Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Disarming the Ultimate Historical Challenge to Scientific Realism

Bibliographic Data

ID8397129
AuthorsPeter Vickers (0000-0001-5644-4290, Durham University, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume71
Issue3
Pages987-1012
Publication date2020-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-0882 • E-ISSN: 1464-3537
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/bjps/axy035
PMID32801386
OpenAlexW3048830680
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited22

Probably the most dramatic historical challenge to scientific realism concerns Arnold Sommerfeld's ([1916]) derivation of the fine structure energy levels of hydrogen. Not only were his predictions good, he derived exactly the same formula that would later drop out of Dirac's 1928 treatment (something not possible using 1925 Schrödinger-Heisenberg quantum mechanics). And yet the most central elements of Sommerfeld's theory were not even approximately true: his derivation leans heavily on a classical approach to elliptical orbits, including the necessary adjustments to these orbits demanded by relativity. Even physicists call Sommerfeld's success a 'miracle', which rather makes a joke of the so-called 'no miracles argument'. However, this can all be turned around. Here I argue that the realist has a story to tell vis-à-vis the discontinuities between the old and the new theory, leading to a realist defence based on sufficient continuity of relevant structure. 1Introduction2No Realist Commitment Required?3Enter the Physicists4A New Approach to the Non-relativistic Success5Relativity and Spin6Structure and Realist Commitment7Conclusion.

History of science · Joke · Philosophy of science · Realism · Scientific realism · Scientific theory · Philosophy and History of Science · Quantum Mechanics and Applications · Relativity and Gravitational Theory

  • History of Science Literacy as a Core of Science Literacy

    Open Access•Raimund Pils•Education Sciences•2026

  • Is Farr's cholera law of elevation a counterexample to selective realism

    Open Access•Chrysi Maria Malouchou Kanellopoulou•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2026

  • How many properties of spin does a particle have

    Open Access•Alessio Corti, Marco Sanchioni•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2021

  • Escaping the Fundamental Dichotomy of Scientific Realism

    Shahin Kaveh•The British Journal for the…•2023

  • Knowledge of the Quantum Domain

    James D Fraser, Peter Vickers•The British Journal for the…•2025

  • Scientific realism and underdetermination in quantum theory

    Open Access•Marcus Egg, Juha Saatsi•Philosophy Compass•2021

  • Scientific Realism

    Stathis Psillo, Stathis Psillos•Scientific Realism•2005

  • Spin

    Open Access•Margaret Morrison•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2007

  • The trouble with orbits

    Open Access•Anthony Duncan, Michel Janssen•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2014

  • Understanding the selective realist defence against the PMI

    Open Access•Peter Vickers•Synthese•2017

  • Reconsidering the Fresnel–Maxwell theory shift

    Open Access•Juha Saatsi•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2005

  • Theory Change and Degrees of Success

    Open Access•Ludwig Fahrbach•Philosophy of Science•2011

  • How to Split a Theory

    David Harker•The British Journal for the…•2013

Unique citing works6
Citations per year1,2
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae