Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

After Fifty Years, Why Are Protein X-ray Crystallographers Still in Business

Bibliographic Data

ID8399115
AuthorsSandra D Mitchell (University of Pittsburgh, corresponding author), Angela M Gronenborn (0000-0001-9072-3525, Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin)
Year2017
Volume68
Issue3
Pages703-723
Publication date2017-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-0882 • E-ISSN: 1464-3537
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/bjps/axv051
OpenAlexW2177055423
LanguageEN
Citations received10
References cited44

It has long been held that the structure of a protein is determined solely by the interactions of the atoms in the sequence of amino acids of which it is composed, and thus the stable, biologically functional conformation should be predictable by ab initio or de novo methods. However, except for small proteins, ab initio predictions have not been successful. We explain why this is the case and argue that the relationship among the different methods, models, and representations of protein structure is one of integrative pluralism. Our defence appeals to specific features of the complexity of the functional protein structure and to the partial character of representation in general. We present examples of integrative strategies in protein science. 1. Introduction2. Partiality of Representation3. Protein Functional Complexity4. Modelling Protein Structure4.1 Integrating ab initio and experimental models4.2 Integrating multiple experimental models5. Conclusion

Ab initio · Biology · Character (mathematics) · Computational biology · Epistemology · Physics · Pluralism (philosophy) · Political science · Protein structure · Protein structure prediction · Quantum mechanics · Representation (politics) · Sequence (biology) · Biochemistry · Chemistry · Computer Science · Enzyme Structure and Function · Mathematics · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Protein Structure and Dynamics

  • Pluralism and complexity without integration? A critical appraisal of Mitchell’s integrative pluralism

    Open Access•Roger Deulofeu, Juana Suárez•THEORIA An International Journal…•2023

  • Four Kinds of Perspectival Truth

    Open Access•Michela Massimi•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2016

  • The Brain Abstracted

    Open Access•M Chirimuuta•The Brain Abstracted•2024

  • A relational-constructionist account of protein macrostructure and function

    Open Access•Gil Santos, Gabriel Vallejos et al.•Foundations of Chemistry•2020

  • A Monist Proposal

    Open Access•Agnes Bolinska•Erkenntnis•2024

  • Effective integration and models of information

    Open Access•Agnes Bolinska, Andrej Sali•Synthese•2025

  • Mixed-Effects Modeling and Nonreductive Explanation

    Open Access•Wei Fang•Philosophy of Science•2019

  • Method-Driven Experiments and the Search for Dark Matter

    Open Access•Siska De Baerdemaeker•Philosophy of Science•2021

  • Through the Fractured Looking Glass

    Open Access•Sandra D Mitchell•Philosophy of Science•2020

  • A Complementary Account of Scientific Modelling

    Martin Zach•The British Journal for the…•2025

  • The disorder of things

    John Dupré•The disorder of things•1993

  • Studies in the Methodology and Foundations of Science

    Open Access•Patrick Suppes•Studies in the Methodology and…•1969

  • Science in the Age of Computer Simulation

    Eric Winsberg, Eric B Winsberg•Science in the Age of Computer…•2010

  • Simulation and Similarity

    Michael Weisberg•Simulation and similarity•2013

  • Inventing Temperature

    Haṡok Chang•Inventing Temperature•2004

  • Biological Complexity and Integrative Pluralism

    Open Access•Sandra D Mitchell•Biological Complexity and…•2003

  • Unsimple Truths

    Sandra D Mitchell•Unsimple Truths•2009

  • The Dappled World

    Open Access•Nancy Cartwright•Dappled World•1999

  • An agent-based conception of models and scientific representation

    Open Access•Ronald N Giere•Synthese•2010

  • How scientific models can explain

    Open Access•Alisa Bokulich•Synthese•2011

  • The perils of tweaking

    Open Access•Brian Epstein, Patrick Forber•Synthese•2013

  • Towards a typology of experimental errors

    Open Access•Giora Hon•Studies in History and Philosophy…•1989

  • Saving the Phenomena” Today

    Open Access•Paul Teller•Philosophy of Science•2010

  • How Models Are Used to Represent Reality

    Open Access•Ronald N Giere•Philosophy of Science•2004

  • Saving the Phenomena

    James Bogen, James Woodward•The Philosophical Review•1988

  • Aspects of Reductive Explanation in Biological Science

    Andreas Hüttemann, Alan C Love•The British Journal for the…•2011

  • The scientific image

    Bas C Van Fraassen•The scientific image•1980

  • Old and New Problems in Philosophy of Measurement

    Open Access•Eran Tal•Philosophy Compass•2013

Unique citing works10
Citations per year1
Citation span2016 - 2025 (10)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 8

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae