Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Independently Motivating the Kochen—Dieks Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Bibliographic Data

ID8399203
AuthorsRob Clifton (Western University, corresponding author)
Year1995
Volume46
Issue1
Pages33-57
Publication date1995-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-0882 • E-ISSN: 1464-3537
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/bjps/46.1.33
OpenAlexW2039879119
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited11

The distinguishing feature of ‘modal’ interpretations of quantum mechanics is their abandonment of the orthodox eigenstate–eigenvalue rule, which says that an observable possesses a definite value if and only if the system is in an eigenstate of that observable. Kochen's and Dieks' new biorthogonal decomposition rule for picking out which observables have definite values is designed specifically to overcome the chief problem generated by orthodoxy's rule, the measurement problem, while avoiding the no-hidden-variable theorems. Otherwise, their new rule seems completely ad hoc.The ad hoc charge can only be laid to rest if there is some way to give Kochen's and Dieks' rule for picking out which observables have definite values some independent motivation. And there is, or so I will argue here. Specifically, I shall show that theirs is the only rule able to save Schrödinger's cat from a fate worse than death, and sidestep the Bell–Kochen–Specker no-hidden-variables theorem, once we impose four independently natural conditions on such rules

Eigenvalues and eigenvectors · Hidden variable theory · Kochen–Specker theorem · Mathematical economics · Modal · Observable · Physics · Quantum · Quantum mechanics · Superselection · Theoretical physics · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics · Mathematics · Philosophy and History of Science · Quantum Mechanics and Applications

  • Modal interpretations, decoherence and measurements

    Open Access•Guido Bacciagaluppi, Meir Hemmo•Studies in History and Philosophy…•1996

  • The modal-Hamiltonian interpretation and the Galilean covariance of quantum mechanics

    Open Access•Olimpia Lombardi, Mario Castagnino et al.•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2010

  • Is There Really No Projection Postulate in the Modal Interpretation

    W Michael Dickson•The British Journal for the…•1995

  • Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems

    Open Access•G C Ghirardi, A Rimini et al.•Physical Review D•1986

  • On the Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics

    Open Access•JOHN S BELL•Reviews of Modern Physics•1966

  • Quantum Mechanics

    Paul Teller, Bas C Van Fraassen•The Philosophical Review•1995

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,1
Citation span1995 - 2010 (16)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae