Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Eliminative Pluralism and Integrative Alternatives

The Case of species

Bibliographic Data

ID8399535
AuthorsMatthew J Barker (Concordia University, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume70
Issue3
Pages657-681
Publication date2019-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-0882 • E-ISSN: 1464-3537
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/bjps/axx057
OpenAlexW2769232888
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited40

Pluralisms of various sorts are popular in philosophy of science, including those that imply some scientific concept x should be eliminated from science in favour of a plurality of (typically more specific) concepts x1, x2, ... xn. This article focuses on influential and representative arguments for such eliminative pluralism about the concept species. The main conclusions are that these arguments fail, that all other extant arguments also fail, and that this reveals a quite general dilemma, one that poses a defeasible presumption against many eliminative pluralisms about various scientific concepts. The article ends by outlining a novel integrative alternative in defence of species. 1. Introduction2. The species Concept, the Category ‘Species’, and the ‘Species’ Category Problem3. What Are Eliminative Pluralism about species, and the Arguments for It?4. Evaluation of Arguments 4.1. Splitting?4.2. Lumping?4.3. The eliminative pluralist’s dilemma5. More General Lessons6. Species Cohesion: An Integrative Alternative7. Conclusion

Biology · Creationism · Dilemma · Eliminative materialism · Epistemology · Evolutionary biology · Extant taxon · Pluralism (philosophy) · Political science · Presumption · Sociology · Law · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

  • The Identity of Stem Cell Kinds

    Guglielmo Militello, Louis Pare et al.•The British Journal for the…•2026

  • Less work for theories of natural kinds

    Open Access•Matthew H Slater•The Philosophical Quarterly•2024

  • Integrative Evaluation

    Open Access•Osvaldo N Feinstein•American Journal of Evaluation•2022

  • Explanations in cognitive science

    Open Access•Marcin Miłkowski, Mateusz Hohol•Synthese•2021

  • Species’ without species

    Open Access•Rose Novick, W Ford Doolittle•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2021

  • Threading the Needle

    Jay Odenbaugh•The British Journal for the…•2024

  • The disorder of things

    John Dupré•The disorder of things•1993

  • The Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy

    Open Access•Marc Ereshefsky•Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy•2000

  • Animal Species and Evolution

    Ernst Mayr, Ernst Mayr-undifferentiated•Animal Species and Evolution•1963

  • Principles of Animal Taxonomy

    George Gaylord Simpson•Principles of Animal Taxonomy•1961

  • Science, Truth, and Democracy

    Philip Kitcher•Science, Truth, and Democracy…•2001

  • When Traditional Essentialism Fails

    R A Wilson, Matthew J Barker et al.•Philosophical Topics•2007

  • Species Concepts

    Brent D Mishler, Michael J Donoghue•Systematic Zoology•1982

  • Biological explanations, realism, ontology, and categories (Reviewing J. Dupré, Processes of life

    Open Access•Matthew J Barker•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2013

  • Darwinian Metaphysics

    Open Access•Samir Okasha•Synthese•2002

  • Darwin’s solution to the species problem

    Open Access•Marc Ereshefsky•Synthese•2010

  • Species Pluralism and Anti-Realism

    Open Access•Marc Ereshefsky•Philosophy of Science•1998

  • Species

    Open Access•Philip Kitcher•Philosophy of Science•1984

  • Deep Conventionalism about Evolutionary Groups

    Open Access•Matthew J Barker, Joel D Velasco et al.•Philosophy of Science•2013

  • Species, Higher Taxa, and the Units of Evolution

    Open Access•Marc Ereshefsky•Philosophy of Science•1991

  • Multilevel Lineages and Multidimensional Trees

    Open Access•Matthew H Haber•Philosophy of Science•2012

  • Resurrecting Biological Essentialism

    Open Access•Michael Devitt•Philosophy of Science•2008

  • For Pluralism and Against Realism About Species

    Open Access•P Kyle Stanford•Philosophy of Science•1995

  • Evolution, Population Thinking, and Essentialism

    Open Access•Elliott Sober•Philosophy of Science•1980

  • Eliminative Pluralism

    Open Access•Marc Ereshefsky•Philosophy of Science•1992

  • Specious Intrinsicalism

    Open Access•Matthew J Barker•Philosophy of Science•2010

  • Natural Kindness

    Matthew H Slater•The British Journal for the…•2015

  • The Effect of Essentialism on Taxonomy—two Thousand Years of Stasis (I)

    David L Hull•The British Journal for the…•1965

  • Moral Realism

    Russ Shafer-Landau, Russ Shafer‐landau•Moral realism•2003

Unique citing works6
Citations per year1,2
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae