Towards a Best Predictive System Account of Laws of Nature
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 8399733 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Chris Dorst (0000-0002-8644-9460, Washington University in St. Louis, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2019 |
| Volumen | 70 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 877-900 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2019-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0007-0882 • E-ISSN: 1464-3537 |
| Editorial | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/bjps/axy016 |
| OpenAlex | W2761550890 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 43 |
| Referencias citadas | 17 |
This article argues for a revised best system account (BSA) of laws of nature. David Lewis’s original BSA has two main elements. On the one hand, there is the Humean base, which is the totality of particular matters of fact that obtain in the history of the universe. On the other hand, there is what I call the ‘nomic formula’, which is a particular operation that gets applied to the Humean base in order to output the laws of nature. My revised account focuses on this latter element of the view. Lewis conceives of the nomic formula as a balance of simplicity and strength, but I argue that this is a mistake. Instead, I motivate and develop a different proposal for the standards that figure into the nomic formula, and I suggest a rationale for why these should be the correct standards. Specifically, I argue that the nomic formula should be conceived as a collection of desiderata designed to generate principles that are predictively useful to creatures like us. The resulting view—which I call the ‘best predictive system’ account of laws—is thus able to explain why scientists are interested in discovering the laws, and it also gives rise to laws with the sorts of features that we find in actual scientific practice 1. Introduction2. The LOPP3. A Problem with Lewis's Formula4. A Pragmatic Account of the Nomic Formula 4.1. Informative dynamics4.2. Wide applicability4.3. Spatial locality4.4. Temporal locality4.5. Spatial, temporal, and rotational symmetries4.6. Predictively useful properties4.7. Simplicity4.8. Recap5 Conclusion
Balance (ability) · Base (topology) · Creatures · Economics · Element (criminal law) · Epistemology · Mathematical economics · Mistake · Natural (archaeology) · Order (exchange) · Physical law · Political science · Simplicity · Computer Science · History · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Probability and Statistical Research · Psychology · Science and Climate Studies
Making best systems best for us
How to Be Humean about Idealization Laws
Rules to Infinity
Humean Laws and (Nested) Counterfactuals
What a Powers-BSA Theorist Should Say About Symmetries
The Ideology of Pragmatic Humeanism
Revisiting McKay and Johnson's counterexample to ( β )
Deep Learning Applied to Scientific Discovery
Why do the Laws Support Counterfactuals
Breaking the explanatory circle
Centering the Principal Principle
What motivates humeanism
Reconsidering the Dispositional Essentialist Canon
How to be a powers theorist about functional laws, conservation laws and symmetries
The simplicity of physical laws
Humean nomic essentialism
There is no measurement problem for Humeans
Induction and the Glue of the World
Humeanism, Modality, and the Governing Conception of Natural Laws
Deference Done Better
The Power to Govern
From Nomic Humeanism to Normative Relativism 1
Isolation, not locality
A reductive analysis of statements about universals
How (not) to be a pragmatic Humean
Humeans are out of this world
The oldest solution to the circularity problem for Humeanism about the laws of nature
Are we free to make the laws
The package deal account of laws and properties (PDA)
Laws, melodies, and the paradox of predictability
Laws of Nature and Theory Choice
Tractability and laws
Does the Best System Need the Past Hypothesis
The normative force of natural laws
Accuracy, Deference, and Chance
Laws of nature as results of a trade-off—Rethinking the Humean trade-off conception
Can Pragmatic Humeanism Account for the Counterfactual Invariance of Natural Laws
Laws of Nature and their Supporting Casts
Why Confirm Laws
Humeanism about laws of nature
On Powers BSAs
Laws of Nature
Non-Humeantheories of natural necessity
| Obras citantes distintas | 43 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 6,14 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 41 |