Factoring in Family
Considerations of Parenthood in the Assessment, Enforcement, and Collection of Legal Financial Obligations (LFOs)
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 8399982 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Brittany T Martin (0000-0002-7107-3077, Western Kentucky University), Kimberly Spencer Suarez (Columbia University), Andrea Giuffre (0000-0002-1454-6907, University of Missouri–St. Louis), Timothy G Edgemon (0000-0003-0885-1136, Auburn University), Veronica L Horowitz (0000-0001-6838-4627, University at Buffalo, State University of New York), Veronica Horowitz |
| Año | 2023 |
| Volumen | 63 |
| Número | 6 |
| Páginas | 1574-1590 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2023-11-18 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | The British Journal of Criminology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0007-0955 • E-ISSN: 1464-3529 |
| Editorial | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/bjc/azad001 |
| PMID | 37986717 |
| OpenAlex | W4321607719 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 36 |
Prior research has yet to address how criminal legal system actors take parenthood into account when imposing and enforcing LFOs. Drawing on evidence from 205 semi-structured interviews conducted across four states, this study explores the relationship between monetary punishment and parenthood from the perspectives of court and community corrections professionals. Engaging Kathleen Daly’s framework of familial paternalism (1987a, 1987b, 1989a, 1989b), we find that system actors obtain and interpret information about defendant circumstances to (1) consider family complexity, (2) construct deservingness and (3) curb spill-over punishment. Ultimately, we find that system actors consider parental status in relation to LFOs and defendants’ ability to pay, though their decisions also hinge on gender and the nature of parental involvement
Construct (python library) · Criminology · Enforcement · Law and economics · Legislation · Paternalism · Political science · Punishment (psychology) · Sociology · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Law · Psychology · Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending · Social Psychology
Gender and Sentencing in the Federal Courts
The Price of Poverty
Probation officer discretion in monitoring and violating supervision conditions
How to Assist Probationers with Debt Problems during Supervision? A Qualitative Study into the Experiences of Both Probation Officers and Clients
An Assessment of Prisoner Reentry, Legal Financial Obligations and Family Financial Support
Fines, Risks and Damages
A Debt of Care
Pay or Display
The “Damaged” State vs. the “Willful” Nonpayer
Monetary Sanctions and Symbiotic Harms
Studying the System of Monetary Sanctions
What Is Wrong with Monetary Sanctions? Directions for Policy, Practice, and Research
Mass probation
The Legitimation Strategies of “Progressive” Prosecutors
The Effect of Gender on the Decision to Incarcerate Before and After the Introduction of Sentencing Guidelines
Rethinking Prosecutorial Discretion
Keep Them on the Straight and Narrow’
An Unpaid Debt to Society
Money Rules’
What is Wrong with Social Theory
Structure and Practice of Familial-Based Justice in a Criminal Court
Courtesy Stigma and Monetary Sanctions
Discrimination in the Criminal Courts
The Impact of Gender-Based Family Roles on Criminal Sentencing
Rethinking Judicial Paternalism
The Use of Gendered Narratives in the Courtroom
Agency-level Perceptions of Monetary Sanctions
Incarcerated Fatherhood
Drawing Blood from Stones
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |