Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Judicial indifference in criminal sentencing

Explaining inequality of the Thai Fines

Bibliographic Data

ID8400836
AuthorsThanyanuch Tantikul (0000-0002-4305-0417, University of Strathclyde, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume64
Issue2
Pages343-360
Publication date2024-02-15
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe British Journal of Criminology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-0955 • E-ISSN: 1464-3529
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/bjc/azad033
OpenAlexW4384816825
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited21

Courts in many jurisdictions remain indifferent to criticisms for their overly harsh or unequal treatments. There has been a debate whether this is attributed to judges’ individual dispositions or rather their environments. This article contributes to this debate by offering evidence from Thai courts about their indifference to inequality generated by the wealth-insensitive fine and fine-default custody. It argues that judges are situationally driven to adopt rigid framing about justice when performing duties, as a result of which judges develop indifference to the ‘side-effects’ of their frame-influenced decisions. The findings imply the possibility that the same mechanisms may exist in other jurisdictions and underline the need to address indifference to prevent failure in reforming for a more egalitarian system

Criminal justice · Criminology · Economics · Framing (construction) · Inequality · Law and economics · Political science · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Engineering · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Psychology · Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies

  • Procedural Violence in Chinese Criminal Courtrooms

    Open Access•Sitao Li•The British Journal of Criminology•2025

  • Misdemeanorland

    Issa Kohler-Hausmann, Issa Kohler‐hausmann•Misdemeanorland•2018

  • Subject Siam

    Tamara Loos•Subject Siam•2006

  • Opposing the Rule of Law

    Open Access•Nick Cheesman•Opposing the Rule of Law•2015

  • Status quo bias in decision making

    Open Access•William Samuelson, Richard Zeckhauser•Journal of Risk and Uncertainty•1988

  • The McDonaldization of society

    George Ritzer•The McDonaldization of society•2000

  • Money and the Governance of Punishment

    Patricia Faraldo Cabana, Patricia Faraldo-Cabana•Money and the Governance of…•2017

  • Sentencing

    Open Access•Cyrus Tata•Sentencing•2020

  • On the Division of Labor in Society

    Charles Bédry•Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung•1934

  • The Philosophy of Money

    Georg Simmel, David Frisby•Philosophy of Money•2004

  • Court Reform on Trial

    Dagmar Hamilton, Dagmar S Hamilton et al.•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•1983

  • Ritual Individualization

    Open Access•Cyrus Tata•Journal of Law and Society•2019

  • Fighting for Virtue

    Tomas Larsson•Contemporary Southeast Asia•2020

  • Violence without Moral Restraint

    Open Access•Herbert G Kelman•Journal of Social Issues•1973

  • Denying Responsibility

    Jacqueline Tombs, Elizabeth Jagger•The British Journal of Criminology•2006

  • Ethical Blindness

    Open Access•Guido Palazzo, Franciska Krings et al.•Journal of Business Ethics•2011

  • Law and Kingship in Thailand During the Reign of King Chulalongkorn

    Frank C Darling, David M Engel•Pacific Affairs•1976

  • The Elementary Forms of Religious Life

    Emile Durkheim, Carol Cosman et al.•The Elementary Forms Of Religious…•2009

  • From Max Weber

    Max Weber, H H Gerth et al.•From Max Weber•2014

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae