Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Separating the Allocation of Punishment from its Administration

Theoretical and Empirical Observations

Bibliographic Data

ID8400853
AuthorsPAUL MOYLE (The University of Western Australia, corresponding author)
Year2001
Volume41
Issue1
Pages77-100
Publication date2001-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe British Journal of Criminology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-0955 • E-ISSN: 1464-3529
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/bjc/41.1.77
OpenAlexW2087522535
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited1

Given that private prisons are now on the correctional scene, there is an important theoretical and practical issue governments must consider when introducing the private sector into custodial corrections. This paper will explore the source of the power to punish, the boundaries between the allocation and administration of punishment and the appropriate regulatory and accountability arrangements to achieve a satisfactory separation of those functions, particularly in light of research undertaken in Queensland. It will be argued that the theory of social contract provides the most useful way to justify a distinction between the allocation and administration of punishment. Significant writings from Australia, the UK and continental Europe will be evaluated. Hence, it provides a more sophisticated understanding of the historical development of this distinction and groundwork for a jurisdictional approach. It maintains that an Australian understanding can only be based on an analysis of its nature and scope in other Anglo-Saxon jurisdictions.

Accountability · Administration (probate law) · Economics · Law and economics · Political science · Power (physics) · Public economics · Punishment (psychology) · Scope (computer science) · Computer Science · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints · Law · Legal principles and applications · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Legitimacy, accountability and private prisons

    Open Access•Elaine Genders•Punishment & Society•2002

  • Privatization and coercion

    Open Access•Wendy Fitzgibbon, John Lea•Theoretical Criminology•2017

  • Zero tolerance, mandatory sentencing and early liberal arguments for penal reform

    Open Access•Bruce Buchan•International Journal of the…•2002

  • Can Prisons Be Legitimate

    Richard Sparks•The British Journal of Criminology•1994

Citations per year0.13
Citation span2002 - 2017 (16)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae