What's New in Evaluation Research? A Note on the Pawson and Tilley Article
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 8401019 |
|---|---|
| Autores | T Bennett (0000-0001-7210-2151, Institute of Criminology, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 1996 |
| Volumen | 36 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 567-573 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1996-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | The British Journal of Criminology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0007-0955 • E-ISSN: 1464-3529 |
| Editorial | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a014111 |
| OpenAlex | W2318670180 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 4 |
This paper examines the criticisms of quasi-experimental design included in a recent article by Pawson and Tilley (1994). The note argues that the criticisms are poorly developed and unconvincing and concludes that the article provides us with little that is new and nothing that is useful in developing research methods in criminology
Epistemology · Nothing · Sociology · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance · Philosophy · Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,14 |
| Intervalo de citas | 1997 - 2009 (13) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 4 |