Deviance in Science
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8402032 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nachman Ben-Yehuda (0000-0002-5096-4292, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1986 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-27 |
| Publication date | 1986-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The British Journal of Criminology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-0955 • E-ISSN: 1464-3529 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a047577 |
| OpenAlex | W2299907954 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
This paper presents and analyses various cases of deviance in science. The paper also examines those aspects of the structure and process of “doing science” which are conducive to deviance. The major conclusion is that deviance in science is badly represented by the old “bad apples” theory and that the “iceberg theory” probably describes this phenomenon more accurately, thus calling for a new criminology of science. The analysis details types of deviance in science, its scope and compares it to other forms of deviance. It is argued that Matza's control theory should be used to understand and interpret the puzzle of deviance in science
Criminology · Deviance (statistics) · Epistemology · Phenomenon · Positive deviance · Sociology · Statistics · Computer Science · Mathematics · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology
Whom Should We Target to Prevent? Analysis of Organized Crime in England using Intelligence Records
Punishing crimes of the mind
Hackers' Accounts
Cycles of invisibility
The Retreat to Positionality Statements
Perceptions of Research Misconduct and an Analysis of Their Correlates
How should researchers cope with the ethical demands of discovering research misconduct? Going beyond reporting and whistleblowing
Faculty Malfeasance
Criminalization and Deviantization as Properties of the Social Order
| Citations per year | 0.26 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1992 - 2026 (35) |
| Highly cited | No |