Criterion Referencing and the Meaning of National Curriculum Assessment
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8405565 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Steve Sizmur (0000-0001-9776-8531, National Foundation for Educational Research), Marian Sainsbury (National Foundation for Educational Research) |
| Year | 1997 |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 123-140 |
| Publication date | 1997-06-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | British Journal of Educational Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-1005 • E-ISSN: 1467-8527 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1467-8527.00041 |
| OpenAlex | W2066677708 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 6 |
Criterion-referenced assessment has made promises that it is unable to keep. The idea that a criterion-referenced test may afford a clear and direct interpretation in terms of exactly which tasks an examinee can perform is unattainable for the kinds of learning promoted in complex curricula, such as the National Curriculum in England and Wales. However, examining more carefully the origin of these claims suggests that they reflect a particularly narrow view of criterion referencing, founded on some dubious assumptions. A reanalysis of the notion of criterion referencing shows that there are advantages to adopting an approach that references assessment outcomes to an underlying educational construct, not only in clarifying how those outcomes should be interpreted, but also in terms of manageability. The introduction of level descriptions for National Curriculum assessment is discussed in relation to this approach
Construct (python library) · Criterion-referenced test · Curriculum · Data mining · Epistemology · Interpretation (philosophy) · Mathematics education · Meaning (existential) · National curriculum · Pedagogy · Relation (database) · Sociology · Standardized test · Test (biology) · Computer Science · Educational Assessment and Pedagogy · Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies · Psychology · Student Assessment and Feedback
| Highly cited | No |
|---|