Excess and Responsibility

As a great deal of contemporary discussion reveals, there is an ongoing interest in determining the ethical and political relevance of Jacques Derrida's work. From standpoints deconstructive and otherwise, critics have tended to converge upon some version of a single question: What is the ethico-political significance of deconstruction? In this paper I shall aim to specify the difficulties of thus evaluating Derrida's work. The difficulties to which I refer stem largely from the inadequacy of established forms of critique to evaluate the ethico-political impact of deconstruction. Rather than abandon such critique, I suggest that a close attention to what constitutes this disproportion is most productive here. Hence I shall argue that if one is to address issues of the ethical and political with regard to deconstruction, and not simply to insist from the outset on the very questioning mode which Derrida strives to interrupt, then another approach is needed. I shall propose that taking up Derrida's notion of ‘excessive’ responsibility attends not only to the main features of the Derridian problematic, but to the political and quasi-ethical aspect of his thinking. Most simply, if Derrida is successful in showing the supplementary structure of responsibility, such that responsibility can no longer be presented as an object or theme of knowledge, then it remains to explore the task of rethinking ethics and politics this initiates

Deconstruction (building) · Epistemology · Object (grammar) · Political science · Politics · Relevance (law) · Sociology · Theme (computing) · Computer Science · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies · Law · Philosophy · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism

• Derrida and Psychology

  Open Access•A Hepburn•Theory & Psychology•1999

  Add to list

• Lost in Transmission

  Open Access•Sabina Avram•Acta Universitatis Sapientiae…•2026

  Add to list