Revolting
An essay on ‘Mao’s revolution,’ by Richard Solomon
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8414686 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Richard M Pfeffer (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1973 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 46-55 |
| Publication date | 1973-12-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-4810 • E-ISSN: 1472-6033 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14672715.1973.10406350 |
| OpenAlex | W2330180345 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
With the recent spate of scathingly negative, scholarly review articles on Richard Solomon's Mao's Revolution and the Chinese Political Culture, I fear we are on the verge of throwing out a baby with its bath. In this case, ironically, we are incited to murder by the baby's father, who seems to think that his psychocultural bath is the baby. If one may be so arrogant as to disagree with an author regarding the identity of his offspring, I would suggest the baby and the bath are distinguishable, the one healthy and bouncing, if all wet, and the other ready to be disposed of
Aesthetics · Identity (music · Political science · Politics · Psychoanalysis · Sociology · Chinese history and philosophy · History · Law · Philosophy · Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|