Neither liberalization nor statist regime
A materialist point of view
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8414729 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Paresh Chattopadhyay (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1995 |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 53-56 |
| Publication date | 1995-12-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-4810 • E-ISSN: 1472-6033 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14672715.1995.10413037 |
| OpenAlex | W2315574652 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 8 |
ExtractGail Omvedt's piece, ostensibly on the World Bank, is actually an argument for liberalization as opposed to statist regimes. The following lines responding to her piece concern this larger issue. While sharing her critique of the dependency theory as well as some of her negative views on statist regimes, I have basic differences with her on a number of points in her discourse
Argument (complex analysis · Economics · Epistemology · Liberalization · Market economy · Materialism · Neoclassical economics · Positive economics · Economic Theory and Policy · Income, Poverty, and Inequality · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|