Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

The academy on Japanese foreign policy

Datos Bibliográficos

ID8414740
AutoresGordon Bennett (autor de correspondencia)
Año1974
Volumen6
Número2
Páginas33-42
Fecha de publicación1974-08-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaBulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0007-4810 • E-ISSN: 1472-6033
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/14672715.1974.10410748
OpenAlexW2330704065
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas5

Japan's foreign policy was all but totally ignored by American scholars and politicians alike through the late 1960s. The recent rash of English-language publishing on the subject, therefore, amounting to at least thirteen major monographs since 1970, is itself an occurrence worthy of note. Well-known works on U.S. foreign policy of the Kennedy and Johnson years (Schlesinger's Thousand Days, Hilsman's To Move a Nation, Walton's Cold War and Counterrevolution, LBJ's Vantage Point, and others) fail to devote even one single paragraph to the role expected of Japan under America's order in the Pacific. And the first five volumes of this Bulletin (1969-73) contain only four articles about current Japanese foreign affairs, three of them by the same author, Herb Bix. Were it not for Bix, John Dower, Pacific Imperialism Notebook, and the AMPO Collective in Tokyo, the anti-imperialist wing of American Asian Studies as well would be guilty of a most serious oversight. Now, however, it appears the halycon era of Tokyo's passive free-riding “low posture” is coming to a close. Foreign sectors of both the American and Japanese economies are growing. Competition between the two economies is increasing, especially for limited fuel and raw material resources around the world. The Nixon Doctrine is selectively curtailing the U.S. military presence in Asia. China is expanding its diplomatic capacity in the region, even to the extent of pursuing detente with America. And Tokyo is finally being presented with some real foreign policy choices. The Pacific “Anglo-Saxon lake” may not yet have changed into a multipolar ocean, since the U.S.-Japan alliance remains the defining diplomatic relationship in East Asian international relations. But the whole scene is less predictable now than at any previous time during the postwar Cold War decades. And once again the academic world has responded to emergent international conflict by producing an imposing quantity of policy-oriented writing

China · Economic history · Foreign policy · Foreign relations · Political science · Politics · History · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Japanese History and Culture · Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies · Law

  • Japan’S Postwar Defense Policy, 1947–1968

    Martin E Weinstein•Japan's Postwar Defense Policy,…•1971

  • Japan and East Asia

    Arvin Palmer, Donald C Hellmann•The Western Political Quarterly•1973

  • Japanese-American Relations in the 1970's

    Chauncey S Goodrich, Gerald L Curtis•Journal of the American Oriental…•1971

  • Big Business in Japanese Politics

    Frank Langdon, Chitoshi Yanaga•Pacific Affairs•1969

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae