Chinese foreign policy
Toward authentic social science
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8414840 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert Boardman (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1974 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 2-6 |
| Publication date | 1974-08-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-4810 • E-ISSN: 1472-6033 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14672715.1974.10410739 |
| OpenAlex | W2315386068 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 5 |
The Committee of Concerned Asian Scholars has been described, in this Bulletin, as constituting “... a direct challenge to the intellectual and organizational hegemony of a whole group of scholars who, in spite of differences in values and personality, had a discernibly similar approach to scholarship: ‘liberal’ scholarship on Asia, most notably the vast outpouring from Harvard University which has defined Asian studies since the 1940s.” The purpose of this paper is twofold: 1) to point out that this body of scholarship, to the degree that it relates to Chinese foreign policy, has derived no significant inspiration from social science; and 2) to assert that the study of Chinese foreign policy would reap substantial rewards from the application of social science concepts and methods
Foreign policy · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law
| Highly cited | No |
|---|