Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The development of petty commodity production in Mughal India

Bibliographic Data

ID8414849
AuthorsKate Currie (corresponding author)
Year1982
Volume14
Issue1
Pages16-24
Publication date1982-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueBulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-4810 • E-ISSN: 1472-6033
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/14672715.1982.10412634
OpenAlexW2329225722
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited7

Argument, discussion and debate on what constitutes a mode of production abound in contemporary neo-Marxist literature and I do not intend to retrace those paths which, by now, must surely be very familiar. In an earlier paper, focusing on Mughal India, I argued that between the sixteenth and eighteenth centuries, India constituted a pre-capitalist class-divided social formation in which the largest share of the surplus product was appropriated from the direct producers by the Mughal state apparatus. This argument led me to identify the dominant mode of production at that time as tributary since the tributary mode, in pure form, entails the separation of society into two main classes: the peasantry (organized in communities); and the ruling class which, by monopolizing the functions of political organization, is able to exact a tribute from the mass of direct producers. In this paper, I am not primarily concerned with the identification of the dominant mode in Mughal India. My aim is rather to consider the extent to which developments occurred within the Mughal period in the sphere of petty commodity production. My discussion of developments within the sphere of petty commodity production is introduced by an analysis of the relationship between the Mughal state and society, that is, an analysis of the relationship between rulers and ruled

Argument (complex analysis · Capitalism · Capitalist mode of production · Commodity · Economics · Economy · Market economy · Marxist philosophy · Neoclassical economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Production (economics · Ruling class · Sociology · State (computer science · Indian Economic and Social Development · Indian History and Philosophy · Law · Mathematics · Political Economy and Marxism

  • The asiatic mode of production

    Open Access•Kate Currie•Dialectical Anthropology•1984

  • Revisioning modernity

    Arif Dirlik•Inter-Asia Cultural Studies•2011

  • Mode of Production and Anthropology of Work

    Eugene Cooper•Journal of Anthropological Research•1984

  • Analysing pre-colonial South Asia

    Ahrar Ahmad•Journal of Contemporary Asia•1997

  • De-industrialization’, Industrialization and the Indian Economy, c. 1850–1947

    Open Access•Colin Simmons•Modern Asian Studies•1985

  • Land control and social structure in Indian history.

    R E Frykenberg•Land control and social structure…•1969

  • The Peasant and the Raj

    Open Access•Eric Stokes•Peasant and the Raj•1978

  • Marxist Anthropology and Peasant Economics

    Joel S Kahn•New Economic Anthropology•1978

  • Class Structure and Economic Growth. India and Pakistan since the Moghuls

    W J Macpherson, Angus Maddison•The Economic Journal•1972

  • To the Insurgent Sociologist

    Open Access•Mimi Goldman, Judy Grether•Insurgent Sociologist•1974

Unique citing works5
Citations per year0,12
Citation span1984 - 2011 (28)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae