Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Why the World Bank can't lead us to a just world order

Datos Bibliográficos

ID8415201
AutoresStephen R Shalom (autor de correspondencia)
Año1995
Volumen27
Número4
Páginas48-49
Fecha de publicación1995-12-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaBulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0007-4810 • E-ISSN: 1472-6033
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/14672715.1995.10413035
OpenAlexW2312547861
IdiomaEN

Gail Omvedt makes some telling points in her critique. Dependency theorists have been too quick to discount the possibility of capitalist development in the Third World. It is good to be reminded of the dangers of allowing wishful thinking to color our assessments of popular struggles, and it is useful to have our attention drawn to how elites often use populist rhetoric to mask their defense of power and privilege. In a number of respects, however, I find Omvedt's analysis flawed and even troubling

Dependency (UML · Economics · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Law and economics · Lead (geology · Order (exchange · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Power (physics · Privilege (computing · Rhetoric · Sociology · Wishful thinking · World order · Computer Science · International Development and Aid · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae