The moral economy dispute
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8415282 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Edwin E Moise (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1982 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 72-77 |
| Publication date | 1982-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-4810 • E-ISSN: 1472-6033 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14672715.1982.10412639 |
| OpenAlex | W2330247107 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 3 |
The publication of The Rational Peasant by Samuel Popkin has revived an old argument over whether the impact of the modern world benefits or harms peasant societies. As a “political economist,” Popkin devotes his first two chapters to a debate against the “moral economists,” whom he sees as exaggerating the virtues of the past and setting too low a value on modernization and the market economy. Unfortunately, he has misrepresented the position of his opponents
Economics · Law and economics · Moral economy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Law · Political Economy and Marxism
Vietnam’s Post-1975 Agrarian Reforms
Political Movements and Violence in Central America
Prefo and Social Trust in The Du-Hope Barter System of Lamalera Community
Sources of peasant consciousness in South‐east Asia
Peasant Ideologies in the Third World
African Peasant Economy from the Moral Economy Perspective
Farmers, Industries, and the State
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,17 |
| Citation span | 1985 - 2021 (37) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |