A Triptych in honour of the cultural revolution
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8415315 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marianne Bastid (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1970 |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 83-87 |
| Publication date | 1970-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-4810 • E-ISSN: 1472-6033 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14672715.1970.10406151 |
| OpenAlex | W2953941493 |
| Language | EN |
Here are three valuable books which sincerely try to understand the Cultural Revolution and make it understandable to Westerners. They avoid theoretical juggling as well as picturesqueness for its own sake. None of these books takes for granted what a certain rhetorical type of Chinese propaganda states with overflowing phraseology, nor do they indulge in the kind of trifling questions characteristic of many Western commentators, such as: Is Chou En-lai losing ground? Is there a rift between the Secretariat and the Politburo? A rebirth of regionalism? and so on. The authors' most obvious concession to Western “bourgeois-educated” readers is that they try to avoid jargonistic Marxism, and to explain even the doctrinal grounds of the Cultural Revolution with plain words; but maybe it could be argued. that they only apply Chairman Mao's teachings in opposition to the “eight-legged essay style.” As for the “socialist-educated” reader, I should add that the authors also escape flatulent psychoanalysis and sociology
Aesthetics · Art · Bourgeoisie · China · Common ground · Cultural revolution · Honour · Literature · Opposition (politics · Political science · Politics · Rhetorical question · Sociology · Style (visual arts · Chinese history and philosophy · History · Law · Philosophy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |