Tibet in the news
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8415367 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jude Carlson (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1992 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 25-42 |
| Publication date | 1992-06-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-4810 • E-ISSN: 1472-6033 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14672715.1992.10412982 |
| OpenAlex | W2330347394 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 2 |
History, or at least hindsight, has made possible analyses of some of the pitfalls of U.S. reportage on China from the 1930s to the U.S. recognition of the Beijing government. But without the anchor of “definite and decisive happenings about which there is no dispute” to “test the news,” it is hard to delve behind the unease many feel about contemporary coverage of China. Bias studies risk becoming public relations tools, just higher-order propaganda
Advertising · Beijing · Business · China · Government (linguistics · Hindsight bias · Linguistics · Media studies · Order (exchange · Political science · Sociology · Test (biology · China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations · History · Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics · Law · Philippine History and Culture · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.08 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2002 - 2010 (9) |
| Highly cited | No |